Re: svn commit: r605723 - /maven/shared/trunk/maven-archiver/pom.xml

2007-12-22 Thread Dennis Lundberg
My bad, I misunderstood your svn comment. If plexus-utils is used directly by the classes it should be a dependency. Olivier Lamy wrote: > No issue fixed here. > My only concerns was to add a dependency on p-u because p-u is used > directly in some classes of the project. > I know p-u comes here b

Re: svn commit: r605723 - /maven/shared/trunk/maven-archiver/pom.xml

2007-12-22 Thread Olivier Lamy
No issue fixed here. My only concerns was to add a dependency on p-u because p-u is used directly in some classes of the project. I know p-u comes here by transitivity from the other dependencies. It's just to declare something we use directly in the project. Sure not mandatory, do you want I remov

Re: svn commit: r605723 - /maven/shared/trunk/maven-archiver/pom.xml

2007-12-22 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Which of the declared dependencies is the problem? Did you fix the problem there too? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: olamy > Date: Wed Dec 19 14:32:51 2007 > New Revision: 605723 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=605723&view=rev > Log: > add dependency on p-u which it's used but not d