Re: svn commit: r349037 - /maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/announcement/plugin.jelly

2005-11-25 Thread Lukas Theussl
I was thinking about this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@maven.apache.org/msg44176.html and thought I'd be on the safer side with maven:get. I didn't know about the problem with dots, I'll revert my commit. Thanks for the watch-out! -Lukas Arnaud HERITIER wrote: In theory if you

Re: svn commit: r349037 - /maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/announcement/plugin.jelly

2005-11-25 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
In theory if you are reading properties in the current plugin you don't need to use maven:get You can access to them with ${my.property} But be careful it works only with properties for the current plugin If you need to create a new variable in your script you musn't use dots (.) in its name. Arn

Re: svn commit: r349037 - /maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/announcement/plugin.jelly

2005-11-25 Thread Brett Porter
Lukas, Are you sure this works? Dotted vars generally get treated as object references when used like below, I thought, and the blow is actually longer :) maven:get was really meant to peek and poke other plugins, not itself. Cheers, Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: ltheussl > Date: Fri