Well if we need to get a supporting change into core, and this feature only
works on newer versions of maven, falling back to the old way. I think we
can live with that. If anything it would be a driver for people to upgrade
;-)
On Saturday, 24 November 2012, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'm having
I'm having a bit of a pause figuring out how to implement Stephen's idea.
The crux here is to tell the reactor that the official output of shade
should function in the reactor as the primary result artifact of the
current project, *without* overwriting the usual file name. Since the
jar plugin wil
I'm having a bit of a pause figuring out how to implement Stephen's idea.
The crux here is to tell the reactor that the official output of shade
should function in the reactor as the primary result artifact of the
current project, *without* overwriting the usual file name.
My initial thought is t
In that case, it's got to be 3.0, IMO.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
> > This would be an incompatible change, would it?
>
> Yes, indeed, insofar as anyone who scripted to expect the shaded
> version to be
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> And you'll recall my vote is for 3.0 (assuming the idea works and you
> decide to go ahead with it, that is)
I have no objection to 3. I sent this message because (1) the recent
release of 2.0 made me feel some risk of silliness, and (b)
And you'll recall my vote is for 3.0 (assuming the idea works and you
decide to go ahead with it, that is)
[Briefly, for anyone who is interested, the idea is to replace the artifact
attached to the reactor, rather than replace the file... Thus jar:jar's
output will be the responsibility of jar:ja
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> This would be an incompatible change, would it?
Yes, indeed, insofar as anyone who scripted to expect the shaded
version to be sitting in target under finalName would be broken
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Benson Margulies
This would be an incompatible change, would it?
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I want to take up a suggestion of Stephen Connolly and fix the
> interactions between shade and jar by changing the default file name
> of 'replacing' shaded jars. I'd like incremental ja
I want to take up a suggestion of Stephen Connolly and fix the
interactions between shade and jar by changing the default file name
of 'replacing' shaded jars. I'd like incremental jar-ing to work by
default, so I want to change the default behavior. 2.1 or 3.0?
---
Please ignore this, I'll send a coherent alternative in a moment with
a different subject.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I want to take up a suggestion of Stephen Connolly and fix the
> interactions between shade and jar by changing the default file name
> of 'replaci
I want to take up a suggestion of Stephen Connolly and fix the
interactions between shade and jar by changing the default file name
of 'replacing' shaded jars. Since no one has marked fixed anything
since the last release, I'm just going to set the version to be
2.0-SNAPSHOT.
-
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> go for it
+1
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
go for it
On 28 October 2011 22:41, Benson Margulies wrote:
> A user is asking for one. Anyone mind if I tee it up?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mave
A user is asking for one. Anyone mind if I tee it up?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
correct
On 15-Oct-08, at 3:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200809.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AFAICT, this passed the vote, but hasn't been pushed out yet?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
-
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200809.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AFAICT, this passed the vote, but hasn't been pushed out yet?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
-
16 matches
Mail list logo
