John Casey wrote:
This is complete. It's in both the branch and trunk SVN.
Cool, then I think we can publish a link to the next successful build
from the CI process. The failing it0018 is simply a problem with the
resource plugin not escaping the "\" character in paths placed in
properties f
This is complete. It's in both the branch and trunk SVN.
-j
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I know we thought both were equally good names and at least I had a
preference for before/after. However, Greg has pointed out we already
have pre/post clean and site. We should be consistent.
I didn't want to
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I know we thought both were equally good names and at least I had a
preference for before/after. However, Greg has pointed out we already
have pre/post clean and site. We should be consistent.
I didn't want to make the call myself, but I think we should change this
befor
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
I know we thought both were equally good names and at least I had a
preference for before/after. However, Greg has pointed out we already
have pre/post clean and site. We should be consistent.
I didn't want to make the call myself, but I think we should
+1
Arnaud
On 1/12/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: jeudi 12 janvier 2006 13:20
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: rename before/
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: jeudi 12 janvier 2006 13:20
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: rename before/after-integration test to pre/post
>
> Hi,
>
> I know we thought both were equally good names and at
Hi,
I know we thought both were equally good names and at least I had a
preference for before/after. However, Greg has pointed out we already
have pre/post clean and site. We should be consistent.
I didn't want to make the call myself, but I think we should change this
before the 2.0.2 release. I
