RE: plugin sites have been rebuilt...

2004-05-02 Thread Brett Porter
> Vincent discussed this with dIon and me on IRC and we > supported this change. That's fine, but it was a reasonably large change, and it seemed like there were unresolved issues around it reading the mailing list. Anyway, if everyone is happy, I'm ok with it - I just wanted to make sure everyo

Re: plugin sites have been rebuilt...

2004-05-02 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
To: 'Maven Developers List' Subject: plugin sites have been rebuilt... FYI, I've just rebuilt all the plugin web sites. Boy, that was long and memory hungry! I had given the JVM 512M of RAM and it could only reach letter J of the plugins. I had to do it chunck by chunck. We still

RE: plugin sites have been rebuilt...

2004-05-02 Thread Brett Porter
POM as to where the other bits are located). Less magic is a good thing. Well documented defaults are even better. - Brett > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 3 May 2004 7:34 AM > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subje

RE: plugin sites have been rebuilt...

2004-05-02 Thread Jason van Zyl
t; Sent: Monday, 3 May 2004 7:34 AM > > To: 'Maven Developers List' > > Subject: plugin sites have been rebuilt... > > > > > > FYI, I've just rebuilt all the plugin web sites. > > > > Boy, that was long and memory hungry! I had given the JV

RE: plugin sites have been rebuilt...

2004-05-02 Thread Brett Porter
The memory problem is in xdoc (I guess jelly) somewhere. - Brett > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 3 May 2004 7:34 AM > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subject: plugin sites have been rebuilt... > > &

plugin sites have been rebuilt...

2004-05-02 Thread Vincent Massol
FYI, I've just rebuilt all the plugin web sites. Boy, that was long and memory hungry! I had given the JVM 512M of RAM and it could only reach letter J of the plugins. I had to do it chunck by chunck. We still have a memory problem somewhere it seems. -Vincent