Re: overriding via a profile

2008-11-10 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Nick Pellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > If a plugin is defined in the normal build section of a pom and has defined > a specific execution, is it possible to override this execution by defining > the same plugin in a profile? > > The plugin I am working on,

Re: overriding via a profile

2008-11-10 Thread Nick Pellow
A concrete manifestation of this problem is outlined here: http://forums.atlassian.com/thread.jspa?messageID=257293240 Ideally - could we add another sub-element to the element which decides whether or not to merge the configuration defined in the profile with that in the default definition

Re: overriding via a profile

2008-11-10 Thread Nick Pellow
Hi Brian, Even changing the executions to something else doesn't appear to work. Is there anything my plugin can do, to prevent the executions in the default plugin definition being merged with those defined in a profile? Cheers, Nick On 30/10/2008, at 12:49 AM, Brian Fox wrote: You can't

Re: overriding via a profile

2008-10-29 Thread Brian Fox
You can't unset something like that because it appears null and the merge will overwrite it. You could change it to something else though --Brian (mobile) On Oct 29, 2008, at 1:49 AM, Nick Pellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, If a plugin is defined in the normal build section of a pom and

overriding via a profile

2008-10-28 Thread Nick Pellow
Hi, If a plugin is defined in the normal build section of a pom and has defined a specific execution, is it possible to override this execution by defining the same plugin in a profile? The plugin I am working on, uses a forked build lifecycle, so when I try to do this, I see the executio