Hi all -
the request for the skip-parameter started as a requirement to break an
infinite loop. When I discovered how the plugin was used and told that
binding the plugin to a different phase, the loop was gone. Even
though, the request for the skip parameter stayed.
Untrue. I opened MJAV
Am 06.08.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Robert Scholte:
fooled. So it must be javadoc:fix + compiler:compile + scm:commit.
The Maven-way would be a lifecycle for things like that, right? Like the
clean or site lifecycle. A general purpose "manage source code"
lifecycle with phases like "prepare-main-s
Am 08/06/16 um 11:35 schrieb Robert Scholte:
> I consider the javadoc:fix goal in the same range as the release:prepare
> release:perform combination (why as is everything executed twice) and
> cobertura-maven-plugin (why are the tests executed twice) and the fix-goal
> is probably even worse
Hi all,
the request for the skip-parameter started as a requirement to break an
infinite loop. When I discovered how the plugin was used and told that
binding the plugin to a different phase, the loop was gone. Even though,
the request for the skip parameter stayed.
I consider the javadoc
;
>> From: "Richard Sand"
>> To: dev@maven.apache.org
>> Sent: 8/1/2016 6:33:30 PM
>> Subject: opinions on MJAVADOC-451
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask for opinions on
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAV
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Christopher wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:19 AM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 5, 2016 7:41 AM, "Benson Margulies"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Christopher
> > wrote:
> > > > I'm always in favor of adding skip properties. They a
What about putting the skip option into an abstract base plugin class? Just
thinking out loud
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 5, 2016, at 6:51 PM, Christopher wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:19 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 5, 2016 7:41 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fr
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:19 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2016 7:41 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Christopher
> wrote:
> > > I'm always in favor of adding skip properties. They are very useful for
> > > manipulating builds for debugging, running on
ard
> >>
> >> ------ Original Message --
> >>
> >> From: "Richard Sand"
> >> To: dev@maven.apache.org
> >> Sent: 8/1/2016 6:33:30 PM
> >> Subject: opinions on MJAVADOC-451
> >>
> >> >Hi all,
> >>
; Anyone want to give this a quick read/opinion? :-)
>>
>> -Richard
>>
>> -- Original Message --
>>
>> From: "Richard Sand"
>> To: dev@maven.apache.org
>> Sent: 8/1/2016 6:33:30 PM
>> Subject: opinions on MJAVADOC-451
>>
&
4, 2016, 11:47 Richard Sand wrote:
> Anyone want to give this a quick read/opinion? :-)
>
> -Richard
>
> -- Original Message --
>
> From: "Richard Sand"
> To: dev@maven.apache.org
> Sent: 8/1/2016 6:33:30 PM
> Subject: opinions on MJAVADOC-451
>
Anyone want to give this a quick read/opinion? :-)
-Richard
-- Original Message --
From: "Richard Sand"
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Sent: 8/1/2016 6:33:30 PM
Subject: opinions on MJAVADOC-451
Hi all,
I'd like to ask for opinions on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
Hi all,
I'd like to ask for opinions on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-451. Robert Scholte and I
have been discussing this off list and essentially disagree on it.
The request is very simple - to add a "skip" parameter to the
javadoc:fix goal. In my projects we are using the
13 matches
Mail list logo
