Re: note for profiles

2005-05-29 Thread Brett Porter
Jason van Zyl wrote: On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 10:47 +1000, Brett Porter wrote: I believe that should be an integration test, firstly - Is the criterion is that it uses an external tool? Maybe it should be called a functional test in some cases, I may be abusing the word. But I don't

Re: note for profiles

2005-05-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 10:47 +1000, Brett Porter wrote: > I believe that should be an integration test, firstly - Is the criterion is that it uses an external tool? I want to test that the component actually works isolation so I'm not sure I would consider that an integration test. some of the

Re: note for profiles

2005-05-28 Thread Brett Porter
I believe that should be an integration test, firstly - only executed when an env is present and not part of the normal jar build. Same with all those wagon and scm tests. For me, I'm fine if they get run as a separate step after install. I think when we discssued it on IRC (it should be in th

note for profiles

2005-05-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
Howdy, Just making a note here so that I don't forget: I'm building all the plexus components and the plexus-compile-jikes component needs the jikes on the cli and if someone running the reactor didn't have jikes installed the build would fail even though there is nothing wrong with the component