MNG-6186 created to track the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6186
Le dimanche 12 mars 2017, 17:18:06 CET Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> Le samedi 11 mars 2017, 15:05:18 CET Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > Obviously would be better if upstream was fixed that we didn
Le samedi 11 mars 2017, 15:05:18 CET Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> +1 from me.
>
> Obviously would be better if upstream was fixed that we didn't need the
> copy&paste but pragmatism says this is the fix for 3.5.0
>
> Extra brownie points for raising the issue upstream and fencing the
> additions
+1 from me..
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
On 11/03/17 17:47, Robert Scholte wrote:
+1
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 16:05:18 +0100, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
+1 from me.
Obviously would be better if upstream was fixed that we didn't need the
copy&paste but pragmatism says this is the fix for 3.5.0
Extra b
+1
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 16:05:18 +0100, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
+1 from me.
Obviously would be better if upstream was fixed that we didn't need the
copy&paste but pragmatism says this is the fix for 3.5.0
Extra brownie points for raising the issue upstream and fencing the
additions with co
+1 from me.
Obviously would be better if upstream was fixed that we didn't need the
copy&paste but pragmatism says this is the fix for 3.5.0
Extra brownie points for raising the issue upstream and fencing the
additions with comments to say "TODO rework/remove when jansi fixes XYZ-123"
On Sat 11
there has been some discussion about the way to solve temp file creation for
native libs used by JAnsi
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6115
Is it ok to merge MNG-6115-2 branch with this commit
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/commit/c36cf425
to master?
Regards,
Hervé
