st
> Subject: Re: maven test release
>
> On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 11:10, Dion Gillard wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure I see the issue. If you are suggesting it should be
> > another 'artifact JAR', I can see how that would be good, with a
> > standard naming
It's currently in v1.6.1-SNAPSHOT of the jar plugin. Which could be
built from CVS.
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:22:03 +0200, Jerome Lacoste
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The reasons I think for including source jars in Maven 1.0
> [...]
> > That's my 2c. Does anyone else feel that it's a must have
> The reasons I think for including source jars in Maven 1.0
[...]
> That's my 2c. Does anyone else feel that it's a must have feature for 1.0?
As a user, I would also like to have the code.
If it isn't possible to do that for 1.0, maybe there is a way to
automatically download/install them usin
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:13:30 +1000, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely. You're welcome to try and convince me/the list otherwise on it... I
> just feel that its not a must-have feature for 1.0. We're getting patches almost
> daily now, and we'd never cut a release if all of them
