+1
On Feb 21, 2015, at 12:24 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
> multiModuleProjectDirectory sounds indeed good enough
>
> Op Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:48:10 +0100 schreef Igor Fedorenko
> :
>
>> Not sure. "top level" and "base" don't sound that much different to me.
>> And, frankly, don't add much clarify
multiModuleProjectDirectory sounds indeed good enough
Op Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:48:10 +0100 schreef Igor Fedorenko
:
Not sure. "top level" and "base" don't sound that much different to me.
And, frankly, don't add much clarify to the term either. Maybe it should
be "multiModuleProjectDirectory",
Not sure. "top level" and "base" don't sound that much different to me.
And, frankly, don't add much clarify to the term either. Maybe it should
be "multiModuleProjectDirectory", i.e. without "base" or "top level"
adjective?
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2015-02-21 11:27, Robert Scholte wrote:
It's len
It's lengthly, but indeed better. And now that we don't care about its
length, how about TopLevelDirectory instead of BaseDirectory, just to
reflect that it is has nothing to with the location of uber module-parent
like in a flattened multimodule structure?
Robert
Op Sat, 21 Feb 2015 16:4
Correct. What I called "projectBaseDirectory" represents root directory
of a multimodule project. It is not related to parent/child relationship
among project modules. And it is not the same as "reactor base
directory" as it is currently implemented, but I agree reactor build
should behave like yo
Technically the reactor right now are the projects in modules from where you
start the build.
I think what this variable is trying to represent is the base directory of the
multi-module project. I would argue that, ultimately, the reactor base
directory should be the same as the multi-module p
Op Sat, 21 Feb 2015 14:12:22 +0100 schreef Igor Fedorenko
:
On 2015-02-21 7:02, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi Igor,
I agree that something like MNG-5767 can indeed help with the
experience.
Looking at the implementation I find the name projectBaseDirectory
confusing, I would have thought tha
On 2015-02-21 7:02, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi Igor,
I agree that something like MNG-5767 can indeed help with the experience.
Looking at the implementation I find the name projectBaseDirectory
confusing, I would have thought that this is a per project(module)
baseDirectory.
We already have thin
Hi Igor,
I agree that something like MNG-5767 can indeed help with the experience.
Looking at the implementation I find the name projectBaseDirectory
confusing, I would have thought that this is a per project(module)
baseDirectory.
We already have things like project.basedir and project.exe
