Re: maven-artifact patches

2007-08-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 29 Aug 07, at 8:41 AM 29 Aug 07, Mark Hobson wrote: On 29/08/2007, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would very much like to try and get both versions of Maven to use it. If at all possibly we should try this and between you, myself, Patrick and Ralph we can probably determine if t

Re: maven-artifact patches

2007-08-29 Thread Mark Hobson
On 29/08/2007, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would very much like to try and get both versions of Maven to use > it. If at all possibly we should try this and between you, myself, > Patrick and Ralph we can probably determine if this is possible. If > we decide we have to mimic bugs

Re: maven-artifact patches

2007-08-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 29 Aug 07, at 6:53 AM 29 Aug 07, Mark Hobson wrote: Hi Jason, Apologies for the delayed reply - been a little busy of recent and just catching up on my inbox. What's the plan here, to consolidate maven-artifact between 2.0.x and 2.1.x? Sounds good to me. The work I did on MNG-612 is bran

Re: maven-artifact patches

2007-08-29 Thread Mark Hobson
Hi Jason, Apologies for the delayed reply - been a little busy of recent and just catching up on my inbox. What's the plan here, to consolidate maven-artifact between 2.0.x and 2.1.x? Sounds good to me. The work I did on MNG-612 is branched off 2.0.x at the moment. Let me know if I can help.

Re: maven-artifact patches

2007-08-22 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 21 Aug 07, at 8:49 PM 21 Aug 07, Brett Porter wrote: On 22/08/2007, at 1:10 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: We're going to end up with two code lines to maintain but sharing maven-artifact (and possibly the container) would make it much easier. I'm really not in favour of this. Isn't the inv

Re: maven-artifact patches

2007-08-21 Thread Brett Porter
On 22/08/2007, at 1:10 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: We're going to end up with two code lines to maintain but sharing maven-artifact (and possibly the container) would make it much easier. I'm really not in favour of this. Isn't the investment better placed in working towards a shippable 2.1 wi

maven-artifact patches

2007-08-21 Thread Jason van Zyl
Mark, If you are going to be around today I was going to apply some patches and do some fixes but I wanted to get some feedback about attempting to use the same separate code now in maven-artifact. It would be far better to use the same code for both 2.0.x and 2.1.x and I don't believe th