On 23/08/2007, at 3:59 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
One of the advantages of what you were describing is the ability
to not install anything unless the entire build passes - that has
some virtues as well, but I consider it a separate feature to
fixing the local repository concurrency proble
Brett Porter wrote:
On 23/08/2007, at 7:12 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
Or a better local repository model ;-)
+1. I already started to draft a proposal for the wiki on this, but
hadn't posted it yet.
One where there are two local repositories (committed and current
build) tha
On 23/08/2007, at 7:12 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
Or a better local repository model ;-)
+1. I already started to draft a proposal for the wiki on this, but
hadn't posted it yet.
One where there are two local repositories (committed and current
build) that get layered tog
