The vote has passed:
+6 binding: Brian, Jason, Lukas, Olivier, Stephan, Vincent
I'll proceed with the release.
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 5:17 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-p
+1
-Lukas
Brian E. Fox wrote:
It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed
below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as
an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during releases. The
issue for this is MJAVADOC-137 (reverted MJAVADOC
+1
Le samedi 8 mars 2008, Brian E. Fox a écrit :
> It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed
> below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as
> an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during releases. The
> issue for this is MJAVADOC
Hi,
FYI I think it is important to respect our release process.
Cheers,
Vincent
-- Forwarded message --
From: Julien Graglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10 mars 2008 06:56
Subject: maven-javadoc-plugin 2.4 missing
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The project summary (1) announce v
+1
Brian E. Fox wrote:
It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed
below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as
an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during releases. The
issue for this is MJAVADOC-137 (reverted MJAVADOC-104)
+1
--
Olivier
2008/3/8, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed
> below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as
> an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during releases. The
> issue for this
+1
On 8-Mar-08, at 2:17 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed
below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as
an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during releases.
The
issue for this is MJAVADOC-13
+1
Thanks Brian.
Vincent
2008/3/8, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed
> below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as
> an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during releases. The
> i
al Message-
> > From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 5:52 PM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.4
> >
> > > [MJAVADOC-154] - Bump to plexus-utils:1.4.6
> >
+1
Stéphane
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed
> below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as
> an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during rel
n as someone has time to
> apply the patches, test and release.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 5:52 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.
PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.4
> [MJAVADOC-154] - Bump to plexus-utils:1.4.6
Hm, this task is linked to an issue about a defect in BourneShell.
Another
BourneShell defect has been fixed in PLXUTILS-54 for plexus-utils:1.4.9.
Maybe worth to upd
[MJAVADOC-154] - Bump to plexus-utils:1.4.6
Hm, this task is linked to an issue about a defect in BourneShell. Another
BourneShell defect has been fixed in PLXUTILS-54 for plexus-utils:1.4.9.
Maybe worth to update once again to latest version?
Also, maven-javadoc-plugin:2.4 is known to ignore
It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed
below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as
an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during releases. The
issue for this is MJAVADOC-137 (reverted MJAVADOC-104)
The plugin is staged at:
Hi Rob,
No timeframe was schedule yet. We need to review issues left for 2.4.
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/1/4, Robert Golkosky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello -
>
> I was wondering if there was an expected timeframe for the 2.4 release
> of the javadoc plugin. Jira doesn't show any open defects schedule
Hello -
I was wondering if there was an expected timeframe for the 2.4 release
of the javadoc plugin. Jira doesn't show any open defects scheduled for
2.4, and a quick perusal of the source didn't turn up any snapshot
dependencies.
Thanks
Rob
16 matches
Mail list logo