Re: it0088 broken

2007-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Jul 07, at 6:51 PM 30 Jul 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, *Phew*, boy, did I open a can of worms when fixing this.. Short: it's fixed. Nice hunting. Long: I broke it... Though I only broke an obscure hack.. This code shouldn't have been committed though I understand why it's do

Re: it0088 broken

2007-07-30 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, *Phew*, boy, did I open a can of worms when fixing this.. Short: it's fixed. Long: I broke it... Though I only broke an obscure hack.. This code shouldn't have been committed though I understand why it's done. (below jdcasey's comments, there's a long piece I wrote explaining what goes o

Re: it0088 broken

2007-07-29 Thread John Casey
IIRC, path resolution was taking place in the project builder...which would mean that it could have happened during kenney's cleanup of the interpolation. Not sure, though. (I'm fairly certain on the timing of the path translation, though...I'm pretty sure it happened during project-buildin

it0088 broken

2007-07-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
I'm trying to find the source of the problem, but it0088 is broken on trunk and that's the very nasty ${project.build.directory} not resolving to a full path which caused a tremendous amount of grief between the 2.0. and 2.0.1 releases. I can tell immediately what broke it, but if anyone wa