On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:26:38 Michael McCallum wrote:
> have a meeting will explain in more detail later...
have not forgotten just been really busy and want to give this a proper
treatment...
--
Michael McCallum
Enterprise Engineer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:18:24 Ralph Goers wrote:
> > 2) because and i might be wrong but dependencyManagement messes with the
> > version defined up the chain when what I want is a localised enforcement,
> > its important to isolate the dependency and apply exclusions and version
> > restrictions to
Michael McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:20:40 Ralph Goers wrote:
Why aren't you using dependencyManagement instead of the technique shown
below?
Good question, please refute/correct/flame if/where possible
1) there was no way to use dependencyManagement with deps when I adopt
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:20:40 Ralph Goers wrote:
> Why aren't you using dependencyManagement instead of the technique shown
> below?
Good question, please refute/correct/flame if/where possible
1) there was no way to use dependencyManagement with deps when I adopted the
technique. This works now
Why aren't you using dependencyManagement instead of the technique shown
below?
Michael McCallum wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:16:37 Ralph Goers wrote:
This is one of the problems that has bothered me for a while. It makes
no sense for a project to say I'm compatible with 3.8.x. How in the
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:16:37 Ralph Goers wrote:
> This is one of the problems that has bothered me for a while. It makes
> no sense for a project to say I'm compatible with 3.8.x. How in the
> world could they know that? The dependent project might release a new
> 3.8.x release that isn't compatibl
On 22-Jun-08, at 12:41 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
In the world where there is some rigour in that the said project
doesn't change the API within a major release they know very well.
In Eclipse a great deal of care is taken to make sure that APIs
don't change within a majo
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Frankly, even if version ranges worked as above I'd still probably
not use them during a build simply because I want to specify exactly
what is used in the build. However, it would be great to know that
multiple projects have dependencies on incompatible versions of th
Jason van Zyl wrote:
In the world where there is some rigour in that the said project
doesn't change the API within a major release they know very well. In
Eclipse a great deal of care is taken to make sure that APIs don't
change within a major release of the platform and ranges in
dependencie
On 21-Jun-08, at 9:37 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Oleg, all,
I haven't dug into any of the code yet, but I've read through the
document you were working on. It seems positive and makes sense. I
did get a bit lost on the meaning of the "Tree Builder" section as
it doesn't seem to describe
On 22-Jun-08, at 12:03 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
See below
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Oleg, all,
I haven't dug into any of the code yet, but I've read through the
document you were working on. It seems positive and makes sense. I
did get a bit lost on the meaning of the "
On 21-Jun-08, at 11:16 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
See below
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Oleg, all,
I haven't dug into any of the code yet, but I've read through the
document you were working on. It seems positive and makes sense. I
did get a bit lost on the meaning of the "Tree Builder" section a
Ralph Goers wrote:
See below
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Oleg, all,
I haven't dug into any of the code yet, but I've read through the
document you were working on. It seems positive and makes sense. I
did get a bit lost on the meaning of the "Tree Builder" section as it
doesn't seem to describ
See below
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Oleg, all,
I haven't dug into any of the code yet, but I've read through the
document you were working on. It seems positive and makes sense. I did
get a bit lost on the meaning of the "Tree Builder" section as it
doesn't seem to describe the current tree or
Hi Oleg, all,
I haven't dug into any of the code yet, but I've read through the
document you were working on. It seems positive and makes sense. I did
get a bit lost on the meaning of the "Tree Builder" section as it
doesn't seem to describe the current tree or graph technique, but
maybe
15 matches
Mail list logo
