is.
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: solo turn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 17 août 2005 11:32
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [m2]: include war in war
>
> hi,
>
> would it make sense to allow including a war into a war? so you could
>
ble to live with that.
I agree, not nice but handy (so far).
Florin
- Original Message -
From: "solo turn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List"
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 12:31 PM
Subject: [m2]: include war in war
> hi,
>
> would it
in the simplest case: just overwrite the original.
On 8/17/05, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Sounds rather weird. How would you merge the web.xml files?
>
> s/
>
> On 8/17/05, solo turn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > would it make sense to allow including a w
On 17/08/05, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Sounds rather weird. How would you merge the web.xml files?
XSLT or something similar for example.
Customizing war is such a way makes a lot of sense for me.
Consider 'application-1.1.war' which is located in repository.
As web ap
Hey,
Sounds rather weird. How would you merge the web.xml files?
s/
On 8/17/05, solo turn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> would it make sense to allow including a war into a war? so you could
> take a standard war without touching it, and add specific things to
> it, jars, tld, html, class
hi,
would it make sense to allow including a war into a war? so you could
take a standard war without touching it, and add specific things to
it, jars, tld, html, class. or would this be ugly? how would you do
that then?
-solo
-
