On 10/29/07, Barrie Treloar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/29/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1
> > and if you add the deployment of site too even better
I can vouch for the need for this.
Our internal development has a snapshot client build of 0.5Gb (note Gigs!)
and I quick
agreed - this was already on the list. You can see the list of things
that are intended for the system here:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA/component/12311662
On 30/10/2007, at 3:30 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
The only thing to be careful of is the size of the snapshots
directory.
The only thing to be careful of is the size of the snapshots directory.
Infrastructure has been complaining off and on that various groups
aren't cleaning it up and it "grows and grows and grows".
I think if we had some way to cleanup older snapshots to keep the growth
in check, I'd be
On 10/29/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
> and if you add the deployment of site too even better
+1, I've been wanting this for ages
+1 to site docs too (I assume the snapshot site docs reside in
somewhere other that maven.apache.org)
---
+1
and if you add the deployment of site too even better
On 10/28/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just been trying to build a few things here and there today, and
> found a mass of snapshots not deployed to the repository.
>
> Given that Continuum has quietly been been performin
I've just been trying to build a few things here and there today, and
found a mass of snapshots not deployed to the repository.
Given that Continuum has quietly been been performing reliably on the
zone and producing these snapshots, and is being properly monitored,
I'd like to have it ship
