FYI, I've deployed the latest snapshots to
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots
On 15 Mar 2013, at 00:40, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> On 15 Mar 2013, at 00:24, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> Agreed, I don't see any harm on this being on master.
>>
>> Do those two issues below corre
On 15 Mar 2013, at 00:24, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Agreed, I don't see any harm on this being on master.
>
> Do those two issues below correspond to the two failed ITs here:
^ I think you meant to post a different link... if you're talking about the
core ITs then remember that the issue to bring
Agreed, I don't see any harm on this being on master.
Do those two issues below correspond to the two failed ITs here:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=403286
If so, if you can publish a snapshot I'll update master and then we can let it
bake more.
On Mar 14, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Stu
On 14 Mar 2013, at 14:23, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Why is it an issue?
>
> Unless you have a non painful way to setup jobs to test it against the IT
> matrix how else are we going to vet the changes?
From my perspective it's better in master so people can kick the tyres rather
than have it squir
Why is it an issue?
Unless you have a non painful way to setup jobs to test it against the IT
matrix how else are we going to vet the changes?
On Mar 13, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> master branch really ?
>
> 2013/3/13 :
>> Updated Branches:
>> refs/heads/master 41a292d9a -> 2c2
master branch really ?
2013/3/13 :
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master 41a292d9a -> 2c2bf6e6e
>
>
> Use Eclipse/Sisu 0.0.0.M2 milestone
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason van Zyl
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/repo
> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/c
