RE: genapp maintainer

2003-11-26 Thread Jörg Schaible
Jason van Zyl wrote on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 4:56 PM: > On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:55, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> It might be easier to just keep attaching patches and comments to the >> same issue. With comments you can tell me what's applicable and >> what's not. It's easier to see all these pa

RE: genapp maintainer

2003-11-26 Thread Jörg Schaible
Jason van Zyl wrote on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 4:55 PM: > On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:05, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Since I do not have the rights to remove an obsolete attachment from >> JIRA, you may just use the attachment with the highest ID in ist URL >> if patch files with the same name exis

RE: genapp maintainer

2003-11-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:55, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:05, Jörg Schaible wrote: > > Hello Jason, > > > > Jörg Schaible wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 6:52 PM: > > > Jörg Schaible wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 5:07 PM: > > >> My fear was obviously reasonable. I'll g

RE: genapp maintainer

2003-11-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:05, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hello Jason, > > Jörg Schaible wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 6:52 PM: > > Jörg Schaible wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 5:07 PM: > >> My fear was obviously reasonable. I'll get the CVS update and create > >> the patches again (also for

RE: genapp maintainer

2003-11-26 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hello Jason, Jörg Schaible wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 6:52 PM: > Jörg Schaible wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 5:07 PM: >> My fear was obviously reasonable. I'll get the CVS update and create >> the patches again (also for MAVEN-1052 and MAVEN-1053). May I sent a >> consolidated patch

RE: genapp maintainer

2003-11-26 Thread Jörg Schaible
Ryan Hoegg wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:43 PM: > I wrote the first pass at genapp templates, and all this stuff sounds > great. One thing I'd like to see as well is the ability for other > installed plugins to define additional templates somehow. > Maybe allow > template namespaces that l

Re: genapp maintainer

2003-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 15:43, Ryan Hoegg wrote: > Jörg Schaible wrote: > > >Jason van Zyl wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:59 PM: > > > > > >BTW: I will send additional patches in the following days. I have template-defined > >filter properties in mind. The reason is that a lot more propert

Re: genapp maintainer

2003-11-25 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Jörg Schaible wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:59 PM: BTW: I will send additional patches in the following days. I have template-defined filter properties in mind. The reason is that a lot more properties may be necessary for a project template, but you won't like to h

RE: genapp maintainer

2003-11-25 Thread Jörg Schaible
Jörg Schaible wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 5:07 PM: > My fear was obviously reasonable. I'll get the CVS update and > create the patches again (also for MAVEN-1052 and > MAVEN-1053). May I sent a consolidated patch for all > outstanding issues on JIRA here ? Or shall I create the > patches a

RE: genapp maintainer

2003-11-25 Thread Jörg Schaible
Jason van Zyl wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:59 PM: > On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 07:50, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Maven developers, >> >> although I recognize that you're restructuring the site heavily I >> would like to know, who maintains currently the plugin "genapp"? >> Looking at the wiki

RE: genapp maintainer

2003-11-25 Thread Jörg Schaible
Jason van Zyl wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:57 PM: > On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 07:50, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Maven developers, > > Genapp is mine, I just haven't had any time lately. Welcome to OSS. Yeah, I recognized your restructuring activities. :) >> although I recognize that you're

Re: genapp maintainer

2003-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 07:50, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Maven developers, > > although I recognize that you're restructuring the site heavily I would like to > know, who maintains currently the plugin "genapp"? Looking at the wiki noone is > reported as owner. I am currently working on improvemen

Re: genapp maintainer

2003-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 07:50, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Maven developers, Genapp is mine, I just haven't had any time lately. Welcome to OSS. > although I recognize that you're restructuring the site heavily I would like to > know, who maintains currently the plugin "genapp"? Looking at the wiki

RE: genapp maintainer

2003-11-25 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi dion, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 3:07 PM: > Submit them as Jira issues and hassle a committer. Gotcha! ;-) > I'm willing to look at them in the morning (8 hours from now) when I > get to work. Fine. I've added meanwhile another two: http://jira.codehaus.org/secur

Re: genapp maintainer

2003-11-25 Thread dion
Submit them as Jira issues and hassle a committer. I'm willing to look at them in the morning (8 hours from now) when I get to work. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/11/2003 11:50:50 PM: > Hi

genapp maintainer

2003-11-25 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Maven developers, although I recognize that you're restructuring the site heavily I would like to know, who maintains currently the plugin "genapp"? Looking at the wiki noone is reported as owner. I am currently working on improvements of the plugin , but currently I don't know how to submit