On 12/20/06, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, December 19, 2006 5:15 pm, Bhupendra Bhardwaj wrote:
>> The most simple solution right now is probably to add
>> http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/ to your list of repositories in
>> settings.xml.
> Not really. Because the solution I w
On Tue, December 19, 2006 5:15 pm, Bhupendra Bhardwaj wrote:
>> The most simple solution right now is probably to add
>> http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/ to your list of repositories in
>> settings.xml.
> Not really. Because the solution I was looking for was to package my RCP
> app
> for all plat
On 12/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, what is the way forward?
The most simple solution right now is probably to add
http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/ to your list of repositories in
settings.xml.
Not really. Because the solution I was looking for was to package my R
> So, what is the way forward?
The most simple solution right now is probably to add
http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/ to your list of repositories in
settings.xml.
Regards,
--
Aaron Digulla
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Hi all,
So, what is the way forward?
Is that till we have the feature Graham is working on (downloading eclipse
jars from links like
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.2.1-200609210945/)
we have to download those jars seperately from those urls and may be put in
the project's
On 12/19/06, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, December 19, 2006 10:24 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> =8*O I beg your pardon? I looked in JIRA but couldn't find a report about
> this. Is there? If not, I'd open one. ;-)
>
> The idea that you'll never have to fix a broken POM/JAR/
On Tue, December 19, 2006 10:24 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> =8*O I beg your pardon? I looked in JIRA but couldn't find a report about
> this. Is there? If not, I'd open one. ;-)
>
> The idea that you'll never have to fix a broken POM/JAR/whatever is just
> ridiculous. :-) As I understand it, th
On 12/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 18.12.2006 17:53:54:
> The problem I saw posted recently about this was that once published,
the
> repository is cast in stone, including errors.
=8*O I beg your pardon? I looked in JIRA bu
"Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 18.12.2006 17:53:54:
> The problem I saw posted recently about this was that once published,
the
> repository is cast in stone, including errors.
=8*O I beg your pardon? I looked in JIRA but couldn't find a report about
this. Is there? If not, I'd
On Mon, December 18, 2006 4:59 pm, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> My can't someone on the Maven team run the plugin/script and put them up
> on
> repo1 someplace? That's what I'm having a hard time understanding.
> People
> obviously want them published, what stopping them from being published?
The probl
On 12/18/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18 Dec 06, at 10:23 AM 18 Dec 06, Tom Huybrechts wrote:
> On 12/18/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Dec 06, at 9:59 AM 18 Dec 06, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Graham,
>> >
>> >
>> > On Monday 18 December 2006 04:
On 18 Dec 06, at 10:23 AM 18 Dec 06, Tom Huybrechts wrote:
On 12/18/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18 Dec 06, at 9:59 AM 18 Dec 06, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Graham,
>
>
> On Monday 18 December 2006 04:26, Graham Leggett wrote:
>>> For compilation purpose the win32 eclipse jars
On 12/18/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18 Dec 06, at 9:59 AM 18 Dec 06, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Graham,
>
>
> On Monday 18 December 2006 04:26, Graham Leggett wrote:
>>> For compilation purpose the win32 eclipse jars are availabe in
>>> maven (
>>> repo1.maven.org), so compilat
On 18 Dec 06, at 9:59 AM 18 Dec 06, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Graham,
On Monday 18 December 2006 04:26, Graham Leggett wrote:
For compilation purpose the win32 eclipse jars are availabe in
maven (
repo1.maven.org), so compilation is not a problem.
The eclipse jars in repo1.maven.org are over a
Graham,
On Monday 18 December 2006 04:26, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > For compilation purpose the win32 eclipse jars are availabe in maven (
> > repo1.maven.org), so compilation is not a problem.
>
> The eclipse jars in repo1.maven.org are over a year old, and only a small
> subset of the eclipse
On Mon, December 18, 2006 11:03 am, Bhupendra Bhardwaj wrote:
> "eclipse:make-artifacts" is a nice feature but it will work only if the
> person building and assembling the project has eclipse installed in his or
> her machine, which I think will not be the case as the RCP is one of the
> modules
Thanks Graham for updates.
Is there any expected time frame or maven release, which will have these
features.
"eclipse:make-artifacts" is a nice feature but it will work only if the
person building and assembling the project has eclipse installed in his or
her machine, which I think will not be t
Bhupendra Bhardwaj wrote:
The maven repository doesn't have the eclipse swt plugins for all
platforms. I have few questions, can those be answered please if possible-
- Can I download the eclipse runtime binary or any zip/tar from
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.2.1-2006
ant get task?
On 12/15/06, Bhupendra Bhardwaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
This is regarding the eclipse plugin being developed in Apache Qpid
project.
The maven repository doesn't have the eclipse swt plugins for all
platforms. I have few questions, can those be answered please if
possibl
Hi,
This is regarding the eclipse plugin being developed in Apache Qpid project.
The maven repository doesn't have the eclipse swt plugins for all
platforms. I have few questions, can those be answered please if possible-
- Can I download the eclipse runtime binary or any zip/tar from
http://do
20 matches
Mail list logo
