Re: deprecations for beta-9

2003-03-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
gt; > > >I just wanted to start gathering a list of possible deprecations for > >beta-9. > > > >The only thing I would like to start deprecating is the use of the > >element in dependencies which will remove the need for the fugly > >nota

Re: deprecations for beta-9

2003-03-18 Thread Ben Walding
list of possible deprecations for beta-9. The only thing I would like to start deprecating is the use of the element in dependencies which will remove the need for the fugly notation. So we will always have: explicitly set for depende

deprecations for beta-9

2003-03-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, I just wanted to start gathering a list of possible deprecations for beta-9. The only thing I would like to start deprecating is the use of the element in dependencies which will remove the need for the fugly notation. So we will always have: explicitly set for dependencies. -- jvz