Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-22 Thread Brett Porter
How long does it take for subsequent generations of the site? Hopefully that is then incremental - and if that works, we should be able to do the same with a commit as part of the site generation. The Any23 site is 51M - most of which is generated by Javadoc and XRef. I don't see how Maven can

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-19 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, just to let you know that today I moved the Apache Any23[1] site deploying to local FS directory and then manual commit. It took *more than two hours*, with the good business ADSL upload band at office ... :( Whatever solution we can adopt to deploy the site on svn, it takes too much

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-19 Thread Brett Porter
On 18/01/2012, at 7:59 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Perhaps if the SCM was GIT instead of SVN it could be faster ? > It's not a short term solution but it can be another reason to use Git ASAP. > > I think you misinterpreted a typo in Simone's email - it's the CMS, not the SCM. This isn't rel

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-19 Thread Brett Porter
On 19/01/2012, at 7:40 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > If it depends on svnkit, apache projects _may_ have issues using it due to > tge svnkit license. It's not a problem to use it for deploying our site, it'd be a problem if we wanted to distribute it as part of a release. How we deploy our site

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-19 Thread Simone Tripodi
ve configured the svn:eol-style autoproperty for html files > then it will break the build. > > -Исходное сообщение- From: Simone Tripodi > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:39 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: deploy maven site on SVN > > > Hi all! &

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-19 Thread Stephen Connolly
property > for html files then it will break the build. > > -Исходное сообщение- From: Simone Tripodi > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:39 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: deploy maven site on SVN > > Hi all! > > thanks for the feedbacks - we

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-19 Thread Oleg Estekhin
Developers List Subject: Re: deploy maven site on SVN Hi all! thanks for the feedbacks - we are using indeed the Kohsuke's wagon but to deploy to ASF svn space it takes almost 3secs/page (it could be an issue of my ADSL upload band) but since javadoc is really big, it takes too much time :

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-18 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/1/18 Benson Margulies : > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Salut Arnaud, >> >> yes via Git is fast, I am using the >> org.kathrynhuxtable.maven.wagon:wagon-gitsite and I can confirm it is >> faster than SVN! > > > Not for really big sites. it takes forever. agree sh

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-18 Thread Benson Margulies
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Salut Arnaud, > > yes via Git is fast, I am using the > org.kathrynhuxtable.maven.wagon:wagon-gitsite and I can confirm it is > faster than SVN! Not for really big sites. it takes forever. > > All the best! > -Simo > > http://people.apach

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-18 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Ant :) I got a reply from danielsh on JIRA[1] that simpli didn't allow me publishing the site via scp. I would really appreciate if you could help me to fix the misunderstanding, if any!!! Thanks in advance, all the best! -Simo [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4329 http://

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-18 Thread Simone Tripodi
Salut Arnaud, yes via Git is fast, I am using the org.kathrynhuxtable.maven.wagon:wagon-gitsite and I can confirm it is faster than SVN! All the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ 2

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-18 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > ASF requirements for new incubating podlings requires that sites are managed > >  * via the SCM >  * via svnpubsub > Do you have any links to something that says that, I didn't think there were any Incubator rules about what

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-18 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Perhaps if the SCM was GIT instead of SVN it could be faster ? It's not a short term solution but it can be another reason to use Git ASAP. Arnaud On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all! > > thanks for the feedbacks - we are using indeed the Kohsuke's wagon but > to dep

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-17 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all! thanks for the feedbacks - we are using indeed the Kohsuke's wagon but to deploy to ASF svn space it takes almost 3secs/page (it could be an issue of my ADSL upload band) but since javadoc is really big, it takes too much time :( wagon-ssh is still the faster :) all the best, have a nice

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-17 Thread Stephen Connolly
if the deps are cat a/b i can see about getting kk to donate the code here... but i think it uses svnkit so probably out of luck. (kk is an asf committer on one of the commons projects, so cla on file) - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words an

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-17 Thread Brett Porter
wagon-svn by Kohsuke is much faster, but both should work. Either way, I think the main thing we need to do is make sure repeated identical executions of the site don't change files needlessly, so that the upload is minimal. On 18/01/2012, at 7:04 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > 2012/1/17 Simone Tri

Re: deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-17 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/1/17 Simone Tripodi : > Hi all guys, > ASF requirements for new incubating podlings requires that sites are managed > >  * via the SCM >  * via svnpubsub > > At Apache Any23 we want to keep the mvn generated site for clear > reasons - the problem is that using a 3rd part ftp-wagon the deploy >

deploy maven site on SVN

2012-01-17 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, ASF requirements for new incubating podlings requires that sites are managed * via the SCM * via svnpubsub At Apache Any23 we want to keep the mvn generated site for clear reasons - the problem is that using a 3rd part ftp-wagon the deploy procedure is slow and takes to