Re: current master performance regression

2014-07-22 Thread Stephen Connolly
Ahh yes I remember that build now... dear me... there were nightmares for a few weeks from having peeked at the poms On 22 July 2014 13:46, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 22 July 2014 09:00, Igor Fedorenko wrote: > > Unfortunately, MNG-5312 didn't have any > > test case so I am wondering if Jesse or

Re: current master performance regression

2014-07-22 Thread Jesse Glick
On 22 July 2014 09:00, Igor Fedorenko wrote: > Unfortunately, MNG-5312 didn't have any > test case so I am wondering if Jesse or somebody else can provide more > details about exact conditions that triggered MNG-5312 and, ideally, > setup a regression test. As noted in MNG-5312, I was able to rep

Re: current master performance regression

2014-07-22 Thread Stephen Connolly
BCC'ing Jesse in case he's not monitoring this list. The exact conditions were related to the [evil job type]( http://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2013/11/jenkins-maven-job-type-considered-evil.html) and I think the test case was within https://github.com/jenkinsci/maven-plugin or perhaps a specific

current master performance regression

2014-07-22 Thread Igor Fedorenko
I am trying to assess potential impact of a performance regression on the current master. I believe the problem has to do with inconsistent caching of ModelData instances and is similar/related to MNG-5312 [1] that was fixed back in 2012. Unfortunately, MNG-5312 didn't have any test case so I am w