Re: continuum-webapp models

2006-12-18 Thread Brett Porter
Wasn't sure how certain we were about deleting these, so just raised an issue (CONTINUUM-1063). On 14/12/2006, at 10:34 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote: no, brett' OP was asking if we could axe some of the unused stuff thats all On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jesse, Ju

Re: continuum-webapp models

2006-12-13 Thread Jesse McConnell
no, brett' OP was asking if we could axe some of the unused stuff thats all On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jesse, Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the domain entities dir

Re: continuum-webapp models

2006-12-13 Thread Rahul Thakur
Hi Jesse, Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the domain entities directly in the view? I think we should keep separate model for the view data that only exposes that required stuff for view prep

Re: continuum-webapp models

2006-12-13 Thread Jesse McConnell
yes, the output in the tables wanted certain summaries of data and project group and projects bits like name, group, etc.. so those were just model pojo's for ec:table to consume jesse On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a '

Re: continuum-webapp models

2006-12-13 Thread Rahul Thakur
I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view data' for preparing views for the webapp? Cheers, Rahul Brett Porter wrote: anyone? On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be partially used. Does anyone know

Re: continuum-webapp models

2006-12-06 Thread Jesse McConnell
I think I added a couple of models since there had been precendent in there being other models in use and as a way to present data into the extreme components which needed objects presented in a certain fashion if we can do away with them without issues then I am for that :) jesse On 12/6/06, E

Re: continuum-webapp models

2006-12-06 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
We can clean them. I don't think session-models is used. Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : anyone? On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more? What about vie

Re: continuum-webapp models

2006-12-05 Thread Brett Porter
anyone? On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more? What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid? - Brett