Re: contents of a 1.1 release

2006-10-19 Thread Brett Porter
Something I saw a while back and have been reminded of (they just had a recent release): http://jameleon.sourceforge.net/ Worth looking at too? It builds on top of jWebUnit and others, and might make authoring test cases easier. And they build with Maven :) - Brett On 19/10/2006, at 1:40

Re: contents of a 1.1 release

2006-10-17 Thread Brett Porter
I agree with Emmanuel. IIRC, the profiles are already in the model, and basic choice of which JDK and maven/ant installation to use should be straightforward and extremely useful. I agree that making it more pervasive and using the toolchain support would be even better, but I don't believe

Re: contents of a 1.1 release

2006-10-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 16 Oct 06, at 2:34 PM 16 Oct 06, Jesse McConnell wrote: I was going to try and wrap my head about what needed to get wrapped up for a 1.1 release of continuum this week when I got to talking to emmanuel this morning. I had been under the impression that we were getting near a point that we

Re: contents of a 1.1 release

2006-10-17 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
The introduction of continuum profiles isn't impacted by the DefaultContinuum refactoring. If we don't provide a full continuum profiles implementation in 1.1, I think we can do a minimal one with only the possibility to choose the maven1/maven2/ant/java home directories and use them instead o

Re: contents of a 1.1 release

2006-10-16 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
I wouldn't make a feature-freeze just yet (I'm biased, as I have a feature planned that is very minimal-impact. :) but I wouldn't wnat to wait to release until the new year. I think momentum is an important thing, and the change to group handling, the ui changes, plus the rbac stuff makes continu

Re: contents of a 1.1 release

2006-10-16 Thread Rahul Thakur
I agree with Emmanuel that since 1.1 as it currently stands is not backwards compatible (I think) with the old database we ought to just add in what we need now...But doing this will definitely move out a 1.1 release into the new year...and is that something we want to do? I guess best to res

Re: contents of a 1.1 release

2006-10-16 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I wouldn't like to push a release for more features, they can be released whenever we want as 1.2. Re backwards compatibility we should run some tool like clirr and minimize it. We absolutely need a database migration tool, and will be useful in next versions too. I've heard about ActiveMapper,

Re: contents of a 1.1 release

2006-10-16 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
So we have ... 1) Profiles (should call this build-profile) This is a way to pre-define an environment type to execute the build under. Example of build-profile against a maven 2 java project: * Choose the JDK to run with. * Choose the Maven version to run with. Example of bu

contents of a 1.1 release

2006-10-16 Thread Jesse McConnell
I was going to try and wrap my head about what needed to get wrapped up for a 1.1 release of continuum this week when I got to talking to emmanuel this morning. I had been under the impression that we were getting near a point that we might want to polish things up and cut a 1.1 release but emm w