> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 30 mai 2006 17:56
> To: Vincent Massol
> Subject: RE: clover and cpd plugin clashes
>
> I would argue that the modified Clover code should not be reported on at
> all.
Agreed
Hi Mike,
(answering an email from the past that I hadn't processed and was still
sitting in my inbox)
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 12 avril 2006 00:35
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: clover and cpd plugin
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 12 avril 2006 05:31
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: clover and cpd plugin clashes
>
> Yep, that's definitely a limitation. Something to think about.
>
>
quot;.
- Brett
Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi Mike and all,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: mercredi 12 avril 2006 00:35
>> To: Maven Developers List
>> Subject: clover and cpd plugin clashes
>>
>
Hi Mike and all,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 12 avril 2006 00:35
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: clover and cpd plugin clashes
>
> So this is an interesting bug.
>
> I have clover and pmd:cp
So this is an interesting bug.
I have clover and pmd:cpd-check configured. Clover injects a block of
source into every source file for instrumentation purposes. cpd sees
this block of code as copy/pasted code because it occurs in every source
file and fails my build.
Who's in the wrong here? I
