> > Probably best to say something if it wasn't clear :) Do you mind
> > editing http://wiki.codehaus.org/maven/MavenCvs to make it clearer?
>
> I don't read the wiki and really don't consider a development
> aid. I try to look at it but I forget and find it a generally
> repulsive form of proj
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 19:52, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Yah, I wasn't aware that was going to occur. I didn't find
> > the explanation clear at all or I would have said something.
>
> Probably best to say something if it wasn't clear :) Do you mind editing
> http://wiki.codehaus.org/maven/MavenCvs
> Yah, I wasn't aware that was going to occur. I didn't find
> the explanation clear at all or I would have said something.
Probably best to say something if it wasn't clear :) Do you mind editing
http://wiki.codehaus.org/maven/MavenCvs to make it clearer?
> You should not have destabalized wha
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 18:03, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Ok, so where your code go with the plugin manager stuff?
> >
>
> Also on MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH. Everything in CVS should be on that branch, or on
> HEAD.
Yah, I wasn't aware that was going to occur. I didn't find the
explanation clear at all or I w
> Ok, so where your code go with the plugin manager stuff?
>
Also on MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH. Everything in CVS should be on that branch, or on
HEAD.
So, the branch is where the current site and 1.0 will be released from. The
leak is fixed, but it has introduced some new bugs (Which are currently in
th
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 17:50, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Ok, now I'm even more confused. Where did the working code go
> > that was in HEAD before the switch-a-roo?
>
> Onto the branch. The 1.0 branch was made very recently and contains
> everything HEAD does except for:
Ok, so where your code go w
> Ok, now I'm even more confused. Where did the working code go
> that was in HEAD before the switch-a-roo?
Onto the branch. The 1.0 branch was made very recently and contains
everything HEAD does except for:
- POMv4 modifications Vincent made, and the related changes.xml update
- some documenta
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 17:36, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There seems to be some confusion over the current branches.
>
> Inactive:
> MAVEN_RC1_REFACTOR - Jason's initial attempt, no longer builds or
> maintained.
> MAVEN_RC2_UNSTABLE - my work, since moved and branch closed.
>
> Active:
Hi all,
There seems to be some confusion over the current branches.
Inactive:
MAVEN_RC1_REFACTOR - Jason's initial attempt, no longer builds or
maintained.
MAVEN_RC2_UNSTABLE - my work, since moved and branch closed.
Active:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH - my work, and what should go live for Maven 1.0
HE
