Re: build extensions vs plugins

2005-07-22 Thread John Casey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1, esp. the last bit about the new plugin element. Brett Porter wrote: | Hi, | | Ref: MNG-598, MNG-226 | | We have "build extensions" - ie providers for wagon, scm that are not | really plugins but additional providers for a particular plexus role.

Re: build extensions vs plugins

2005-07-22 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:30:09PM +1000, Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > > Ref: MNG-598, MNG-226 > > How does this sound? +1 -- Trygve signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: build extensions vs plugins

2005-07-22 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:30 +1000, Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > How does this sound? +1 > - Brett > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- jvz. Jason van Z

Re: build extensions vs plugins

2005-07-22 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
this sound is ok for me. Emmanuel Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Ref: MNG-598, MNG-226 We have "build extensions" - ie providers for wagon, scm that are not really plugins but additional providers for a particular plexus role. Currently, these need to be dropped into M2_HOME/lib along with their dep

build extensions vs plugins

2005-07-22 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, Ref: MNG-598, MNG-226 We have "build extensions" - ie providers for wagon, scm that are not really plugins but additional providers for a particular plexus role. Currently, these need to be dropped into M2_HOME/lib along with their dependencies which is not ideal. (SCM ones can be a dependenc