[result] Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-11-06 Thread Brett Porter
Brett, Carlos, John, Jason, Arnaud, Emmanuel, Vincent S, Fabrizio: +1 Kenney, Vincent M, Trygve: +0 Dave Sag, Eric Pugh both spoke positively but didn't cast a numberical vote. Jason is discussing this with Infrastructure, and I have reviewed the IP clearance template to check everything is ok.

Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-11-02 Thread Brett Porter
Kenney Westerhof wrote: On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Brett Porter wrote: +0. I believe these projects are not technically maven related, and hence do not require to be in the m2 repository. There is a distinction between Maven the build tool and Maven the Apache project. Both tools fall within the m

Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-11-01 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 13:10 +0100, Kenney Westerhof wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Brett Porter wrote: > > +0. +0 myself, I agree with Kenney's arguments. > > I believe these projects are not technically maven related, and hence do > not require to be in the m2 repository. It would be the same as

Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-11-01 Thread Eric Pugh
Would surefire or doxia ever be used outside of the Maven2 world? I can actually see doxia being used elsewhere, but would surefire? Having some set of code that Maven uses over on Codehaus, when it is all developed by Maven committers and tightly intertwined seems odd. If there isn't a g

Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-11-01 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : Hi, Doxia and Surefire were small projects started at Codehaus to experiment with new technology that has since been used from Maven 2.0. With one recent exception the committer set are entirely Maven committers. Doxia is the underpinnings of the site plu

Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-11-01 Thread Kenney Westerhof
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Brett Porter wrote: +0. I believe these projects are not technically maven related, and hence do not require to be in the m2 repository. It would be the same as moving classworlds to maven2, except we know classworlds is also used by other projects. To promote usage of these c

RE: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-11-01 Thread Vincent Siveton
big +1 Cheers, Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 8:15 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven > > Hi, > > Doxia and Surefire were small proj

Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-11-01 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 11/1/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since the code is our own work, it is easy to bring here, and the > development can be more easily worked with alongside the primary uses > and discussion can happen in one place. + 1000! fabrizio -

RE: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-11-01 Thread Vincent Massol
+0 -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mardi 1 novembre 2005 02:15 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven > > Hi, > > Doxia and Surefire were small projects started at Co

Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-10-31 Thread David Sag
good idea. Kind regards, Dave Sag   Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/11/2005 02:15:12 AM: > Hi, > > Doxia and Surefire were small projects started at Codehaus to experiment > with new technology that has since been used from Maven 2.0. > > With one recent exception the comm

RE: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-10-31 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 Arnaud > -Message d'origine- > De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mardi 1 novembre 2005 02:15 > À : Maven Developers List > Objet : bringing surefire and doxia to Maven > > Hi, > > Doxia and Surefire were small projects started a

Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-10-31 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 12:15 +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > > Doxia and Surefire were small projects started at Codehaus to experiment > with new technology that has since been used from Maven 2.0. > > With one recent exception the committer set are entirely Maven committers. > > Doxia is th

Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-10-31 Thread John Casey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Brett Porter wrote: | Hi, | | Doxia and Surefire were small projects started at Codehaus to experiment | with new technology that has since been used from Maven 2.0. | | With one recent exception the committer set are entirely Maven committers

Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-10-31 Thread Carlos Sanchez
+1 On 10/31/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Doxia and Surefire were small projects started at Codehaus to experiment > with new technology that has since been used from Maven 2.0. > > With one recent exception the committer set are entirely Maven committers. > > Doxia is the

bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-10-31 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, Doxia and Surefire were small projects started at Codehaus to experiment with new technology that has since been used from Maven 2.0. With one recent exception the committer set are entirely Maven committers. Doxia is the underpinnings of the site plugin, and is used to generate document