Re: artifact relocation

2005-10-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 10:24 +0800, Edwin Punzalan wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry about that. I didn't know that I should be adding the missing jars > too. I thought I was only to inspect the poms. No problem. If we have the information about where the files are to be moved to then we can probably creat

Re: artifact relocation

2005-10-28 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Hi, Sorry about that. I didn't know that I should be adding the missing jars too. I thought I was only to inspect the poms. Carlos Sanchez wrote: We move it manually. I think Edwin added the relocation section but maybe he forgot to add the new jar. On 10/28/05, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PRO

Re: artifact relocation

2005-10-28 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Should be fixed in next push to ibiblio On 10/28/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We move it manually. I think Edwin added the relocation section but > maybe he forgot to add the new jar. > > On 10/28/05, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In two of our ITs the

Re: artifact relocation

2005-10-28 Thread Carlos Sanchez
We move it manually. I think Edwin added the relocation section but maybe he forgot to add the new jar. On 10/28/05, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > In two of our ITs the servlet-api JAR is required. In it0016 and it0018, > and they both use servletapi:servletapi:2.4-20040521 an

artifact relocation

2005-10-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, In two of our ITs the servlet-api JAR is required. In it0016 and it0018, and they both use servletapi:servletapi:2.4-20040521 and says it has been relocated to javax.servlet:servlet-api:2.4-20040521 but there's nothing there as far as I can see. How does the relocation process work? Do we move