Re: ant vs m1 vs m2

2004-06-08 Thread Jerome Lacoste
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 02:13, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 21:19, Jerome Lacoste wrote: > > > > > This is for the most simple of builds with one source file. Just really > > > an illustration of initialization time. > > > > Interesting. > > > > Do you know where does that differe

Re: ant vs m1 vs m2

2004-06-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 21:19, Jerome Lacoste wrote: > > > This is for the most simple of builds with one source file. Just really > > an illustration of initialization time. > > Interesting. > > Do you know where does that difference come from? As I haven't even started optimizing or profiling

Re: ant vs m1 vs m2

2004-06-07 Thread Jeff Turner
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:19:20PM -0400, Jerome Lacoste wrote: > On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 09:43, Jason van Zyl wrote: [...] > Is there a way to enable profiling? I remember Jira having a very nice > filter allowing to enable profiling. I wonder if it's possible and > interesting to introduced somethi

Re: ant vs m1 vs m2

2004-06-07 Thread Jerome Lacoste
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 09:43, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Howdy, > > Just for anyone interested in following the dev of m2: > > ant: > real0m3.678s > user0m2.270s > sys 0m0.140s > > m1: > real0m5.600s > user0m4.180s > sys 0m0.080s > > m2: > real0m2.468s > user

ant vs m1 vs m2

2004-05-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
Howdy, Just for anyone interested in following the dev of m2: ant: real0m3.678s user0m2.270s sys 0m0.140s m1: real0m5.600s user0m4.180s sys 0m0.080s m2: real0m2.468s user0m0.910s sys 0m0.000s This is for the most simple of builds with one source