I see this has been fixed now. Merci!
/Anders
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> Thanks Olivier!
>
> /Anders
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> oh ok
>> Apologize my bad I read too fast the acronym from Anders :-)
>> I will fix that.
>>
>>
Thanks Olivier!
/Anders
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> oh ok
> Apologize my bad I read too fast the acronym from Anders :-)
> I will fix that.
>
> 2012/12/20 Robert Scholte :
> > Let me try to clarify:
> >
> > The site shows the wrong version of the maven-plugin-plugin
oh ok
Apologize my bad I read too fast the acronym from Anders :-)
I will fix that.
2012/12/20 Robert Scholte :
> Let me try to clarify:
>
> The site shows the wrong version of the maven-plugin-plugin.
> Actually, everything under http://maven.apache.org/plugin-tools/ refers to
> 3.1 instead of 3.
Let me try to clarify:
The site shows the wrong version of the maven-plugin-plugin.
Actually, everything under http://maven.apache.org/plugin-tools/ refers to
3.1 instead of 3.2
Robert
Op Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:31:35 +0100 schreef Olivier Lamy :
2012/12/20 Anders Hammar :
euh I just checked
2012/12/20 Anders Hammar :
>> euh I just checked
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?revision=1419847&view=markup
>> and it's 3.2 :-)
>>
>> see
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?r1=1408002&r2=1410738&diff_format=h
>>
>
> maven-site-plugin? I don't foll
> euh I just checked
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?revision=1419847&view=markup
> and it's 3.2 :-)
>
> see
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?r1=1408002&r2=1410738&diff_format=h
>
maven-site-plugin? I don't follow.
/Anders
>
> 2012/12/20 Olivier
euh I just checked
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?revision=1419847&view=markup
and it's 3.2 :-)
see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?r1=1408002&r2=1410738&diff_format=h
2012/12/20 Olivier Lamy :
> 2012/12/20 Anders Hammar :
>> Would be happy to do it,
2012/12/20 Anders Hammar :
> Would be happy to do it, but I have to admit that I'm not sure of the
> process now. Is the docs [1] correct?
> So "mvn site-deploy -Preporting" on the right version should do it?
I started a bit of documentation here
http://maven.apache.org/developers/website/deploy-m
Would be happy to do it, but I have to admit that I'm not sure of the
process now. Is the docs [1] correct?
So "mvn site-deploy -Preporting" on the right version should do it?
/Anders
[1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-plugin-release.html
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Oliv
I'm quite sure I deployed that, but that's a bit of a worthless point
in these days ;)
K
Den 20. des. 2012 kl. 18:01 skrev Olivier Lamy :
> 2012/12/20 Anders Hammar :
>> The site for m-plugin-p is for 3.1, not the latest 3.2 version. Did
>> something go wrong in the latest release, or did this h
2012/12/20 Anders Hammar :
> The site for m-plugin-p is for 3.1, not the latest 3.2 version. Did
> something go wrong in the latest release, or did this happen in the cms
> switch?
must work.
Nobody upgraded that.
So feel free to test it and do the upgrade.
>
> /Anders
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: h
The site for m-plugin-p is for 3.1, not the latest 3.2 version. Did
something go wrong in the latest release, or did this happen in the cms
switch?
/Anders
12 matches
Mail list logo