Hi Brett
On 8/21/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've said in the past I will apply a decent patch for it. Nobody came
> forward with one (the one attached to MPWAR had a few problems I pointed
> out that were never fixed). This still stands.
Now you have a working patch there ;)
>
Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
>I followed the discussion in the past, but I still can't really
>understand what are the reasons why this is such "a bad idea". I only
>repeatedly heard that this is "against Maven way of doing thing" and
>"produce two things from a project".
>
>
This is not it at all,
Hi Brett
On 8/21/05, Brett Porter (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you say you "need" to have a JAR inside WEB-INF lib instead of classes.
>
> We've discussed this at some length and so far there has been little evidence
> this is really needed, but there have been reasons given why it is a b
