> The problem we have allowing unchecked rsyncs is that in the past we find
> that the control over what is actually put in the repositories is not well
> managed in some cases. Using http://oss.sonatype.org helps us maintain a very
> high level of quality. It basically amounts to changing where y
On 2010-01-15, at 11:15 AM, Tony Chemit wrote:
> Le Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:41:51 -0500,
> Brian Fox a écrit :
>
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> We are actually in the process of updating the documentation, but
>> we've decided not to accept new Rsync requests except for forges. For
>> individual projects, it's
Le Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:41:51 -0500,
Brian Fox a écrit :
> Hi Tony,
>
> We are actually in the process of updating the documentation, but
> we've decided not to accept new Rsync requests except for forges. For
> individual projects, it's simply too much overhead to handle rsyncs
> and it isn't sc
Hi Tony,
We are actually in the process of updating the documentation, but
we've decided not to accept new Rsync requests except for forges. For
individual projects, it's simply too much overhead to handle rsyncs
and it isn't scalable, not to mention there isn't a good way to
enforce quality. Inst
Hi guys,
We'd like [1] to synch our repository [2] with central.
Actually our repository is on a vserver with ss access), We aims to add a
knockd to secure it, and it would be much appreciate if we could know the ip of
your machine which will do the rsynch (to add a special in firewall just for
