Ok, I'm on vacation next week, but when I get back in the beginning of
Feb, I will check back here to see if you have reached some conclusion
about the best approach to take.
Thanks,
Neeme
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
There are a set of pending issues in the war plugin that really should be
address
Stephane Nicoll wrote at Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 08:49:
> The old behavior can be re-worked in a way it is mostly backward
> compatible. Regarding the naming issues, we can change it in a way the
> bundled jar file follows the same convention as the "attached" jar file
> (this is purely automate
The old behavior can be re-worked in a way it is mostly backward compatible.
Regarding the naming issues, we can change it in a way the bundled jar file
follows the same convention as the "attached" jar file (this is purely
automated so it shouldn't make a single difference unless people are hackin
I honestly don't have time to look right now, but I would be fine with 2
provided there were tests. You can't break the old behavior even if you think
it's wrong. Document it, let people try it and if folks agree we can make it
the default in the next major release.
On 2010-01-18, at 8:35 AM, N
I wrote the following comment in JIRA, but there is no response, so I
will send it also here.
--- quote ---
I can rework the patch, I just need to know, what the behavior should be:
1. by default turn on the consistent behavior (as the old behavior
seems quite broken to me) and the user can en
Thanks, created issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-215
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
Please create a Jira issue[1] if none has been created already and attach
your patch.
The inconsistency is coming from the way those settings were implemented and
to preserve backward compatibility. The check
Please create a Jira issue[1] if none has been created already and attach
your patch.
The inconsistency is coming from the way those settings were implemented and
to preserve backward compatibility. The checksum issue was overlooked truth
be told.
Thanks,
Stéphane
[1] http://jira.codehaus.org/br
Hi again,
It's now been 6 days since I wrote this e-mail and no response so far.
Does anybody care about the WAR plugin or is it homeless and abandoned? :-P
Or, maybe someone can form an opinion, based on some sort of gut feeling
or some best-practice for Maven plugins?
I would love to get
Hi all,
I have a couple of issues with the current WAR plugin and the way it
packages class files in JAR files (archiveClasses and attachClasses
configuration options), as these two options work independently of each
other:
* archiveClasses moves all class files (and related resources) from
