RE: Voting procedures WAS: [VOTE] Release PMD Plugin

2006-11-06 Thread Brian E. Fox
ed on (effectively a formal RC tag) -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 12:04 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Voting procedures WAS: [VOTE] Release PMD Plugin We need to have better voting procedures, because it's h

Re: Voting procedures WAS: [VOTE] Release PMD Plugin

2006-11-06 Thread Brett Porter
On 07/11/2006, at 5:59 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: How so? I'm not sure what you are referring to. But changing the build to include license files means we need to check that it's all good before we can vote on it. And tests not passing is likewise a blocker. - Brett -

Re: Voting procedures WAS: [VOTE] Release PMD Plugin

2006-11-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 6 Nov 06, at 10:33 PM 6 Nov 06, Brett Porter wrote: We need to have better voting procedures, because it's hard to see what the official count is amongst the discussion. It seems the thread where Jason said these were under way was not explicit enough, so my suggestion is: 1) we stop

Re: Voting procedures WAS: [VOTE] Release PMD Plugin

2006-11-06 Thread Brett Porter
We need to have better voting procedures, because it's hard to see what the official count is amongst the discussion. It seems the thread where Jason said these were under way was not explicit enough, so my suggestion is: 1) we stop the PMD vote thread now. Daniel's two issues are indeed