ed on (effectively a formal RC tag)
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 12:04 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Voting procedures WAS: [VOTE] Release PMD Plugin
We need to have better voting procedures, because it's h
On 07/11/2006, at 5:59 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
How so?
I'm not sure what you are referring to. But changing the build to
include license files means we need to check that it's all good
before we can vote on it. And tests not passing is likewise a blocker.
- Brett
-
On 6 Nov 06, at 10:33 PM 6 Nov 06, Brett Porter wrote:
We need to have better voting procedures, because it's hard to see
what the official count is amongst the discussion. It seems the
thread where Jason said these were under way was not explicit
enough, so my suggestion is:
1) we stop
We need to have better voting procedures, because it's hard to see
what the official count is amongst the discussion. It seems the
thread where Jason said these were under way was not explicit enough,
so my suggestion is:
1) we stop the PMD vote thread now. Daniel's two issues are indeed