On 12/9/06, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
continuum 1.0.3 has been out for a while now and there have been a lot
of tangible improvements that we should get into peoples hands in the
form of the alpha releases. I figured with labeling of alpha we can
freely change the model if we ne
On 9 Dec 06, at 11:37 AM 9 Dec 06, Jesse McConnell wrote:
right, last time I brought this up the goal was to resolve all those
for an actual 1.1 release..
If that's the case that's cool.
I would like to see maybe an alpha-1 release in January perhaps
followed up a beta or two once all the
right, last time I brought this up the goal was to resolve all those
for an actual 1.1 release..
I would like to see maybe an alpha-1 release in January perhaps
followed up a beta or two once all the confirmed new features are in
place (like profiles, etc).
I think the decision had not be to act
Hi,
Is what's in JIRA representative of the next release? Just wanted to
make sure that what's there actually gives users some idea of what's
coming up.
Also, I feel that the version should go back to alpha. Archiva is
simply not even close to being beta software and misrepresents it's
Hi,
If anything is thinking of doing a release of Continuum anytime soon
can you please update Continuum's JIRA so that it's representative of
what's going to be fixed for at least the next release like Kenney
and I have done for Maven itself:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG
I don't
