Re: Unintended usage of core plugin stubs

2008-09-26 Thread Brett Porter
On 24/09/2008, at 6:27 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 24-Sep-08, at 10:02 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: I think we're going to have two major user stories here, people who take the last released IT bundle and run it to validate and people who check out the sources and b

Re: Unintended usage of core plugin stubs

2008-09-24 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 24-Sep-08, at 10:02 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: I think we're going to have two major user stories here, people who take the last released IT bundle and run it to validate and people who check out the sources and build everything and run the ITs. Not sure you ful

Re: Unintended usage of core plugin stubs

2008-09-24 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Jason van Zyl wrote: > I think we're going to have two major user stories here, people who > take the last released IT bundle and run it to validate and people who > check out the sources and build everything and run the ITs. Not sure you fully understand the problem I was referring to. There is

Re: Unintended usage of core plugin stubs

2008-09-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 24-Sep-08, at 7:53 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On 23-Sep-08, at 10:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: As releasing the stub plugins would increase their potential to trouble unaware users How so? The problem I originally described was about users that referred to

Re: Unintended usage of core plugin stubs

2008-09-23 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 23-Sep-08, at 10:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: As releasing the stub plugins would increase their potential to trouble unaware users How so? The problem I originally described was about users that referred to LATEST plugin version and had the snapshot repo enabled

Re: Unintended usage of core plugin stubs

2008-09-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 23-Sep-08, at 10:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On 23-Sep-08, at 9:39 PM, John Casey wrote: Would it be feasible to bundle these stub plugins into a zip artifact that can be released into the central repository, then retrieved, unzipped, and referenced We need t

Re: Unintended usage of core plugin stubs

2008-09-23 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 23-Sep-08, at 9:39 PM, John Casey wrote: Would it be feasible to bundle these stub plugins into a zip artifact that can be released into the central repository, then retrieved, unzipped, and referenced We need to release all those support plugins anything else rela

Re: Unintended usage of core plugin stubs

2008-09-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 23-Sep-08, at 9:39 PM, John Casey wrote: Would it be feasible to bundle these stub plugins into a zip artifact that can be released into the central repository, then retrieved, unzipped, and referenced (via and ) in the tests? This might make it cleaner to keep it out of the hands of

Re: Unintended usage of core plugin stubs

2008-09-23 Thread John Casey
Would it be feasible to bundle these stub plugins into a zip artifact that can be released into the central repository, then retrieved, unzipped, and referenced (via and ) in the tests? This might make it cleaner to keep it out of the hands of normal users... The other thing to think about i

Unintended usage of core plugin stubs

2008-09-23 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, I just had an interesting chat on IRC about some pitfall that I feel is worth to share so that others know about this, too. Somebody wondered why his Maven builds were suddenly prepending [MAVEN-CORE-IT-LOG] to the log output, for instance during invocation of "clean:clean". The origin