Thanks Stéphane,
I've renamed the 2.1 version in JIRA to 2.1-beta-1.
I also added a new 2.1 version in JIRA.
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
> I'd say beta-1 is fine.
> Thanks,
> Stéphane
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>> I'm looking at releasing a new version of Maven WA
Cool, just wondering.
On 16/02/2009, at 7:39 PM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Brett Porter
wrote:
Is it stable? Maybe just move straight on to 2.1 and bump out the
rest to
2.2?
It's stable but there are a couple of things that need to be fixed
that were
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Is it stable? Maybe just move straight on to 2.1 and bump out the rest to
> 2.2?
It's stable but there are a couple of things that need to be fixed that were
introduced in 2.1 such as the caching system. We can call it 2.1 but
2.1-beta-1 s
Is it stable? Maybe just move straight on to 2.1 and bump out the rest
to 2.2?
- Brett
On 16/02/2009, at 3:56 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
I'd say beta-1 is fine.
Thanks,
Stéphane
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg
wrote:
I'm looking at releasing a new version of Maven WAR
I'd say beta-1 is fine.
Thanks,
Stéphane
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> I'm looking at releasing a new version of Maven WAR Plugin. The POM
> currently has 2.1-beta-1-SNAPSHOT as the version, but JIRA [1] has 2.1.
> I probably won't fix all the remaining issues in JIRA
I'm looking at releasing a new version of Maven WAR Plugin. The POM
currently has 2.1-beta-1-SNAPSHOT as the version, but JIRA [1] has 2.1.
I probably won't fix all the remaining issues in JIRA set for this
version, since I don't yet have the necessary knowledge about the plugin.
Which version sho
