On 16 February 2010 07:48, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Just to clarify what I am suggesting:
>
> Plan 1 - which I have rejected on the basis that I feel it is
> un-Maven-like... if somebody who has a strong opinion on the
> architecture and direction of Maven feels that it actually is a
> Maven-like
Just to clarify what I am suggesting:
Plan 1 - which I have rejected on the basis that I feel it is
un-Maven-like... if somebody who has a strong opinion on the
architecture and direction of Maven feels that it actually is a
Maven-like way, then perhaps we should reconsider:
Add an additional dep
Sent from my [rhymes with tryPod] ;-)
On 15 Feb 2010, at 19:23, David Jencks wrote:
Recall that a conformant rar file has all its classes in embedded
jar files, so putting the "outside" actual rar file on the classpath
doesn't give you access to any classes. If you put classes "loose"
Recall that a conformant rar file has all its classes in embedded jar
files, so putting the "outside" actual rar file on the classpath
doesn't give you access to any classes. If you put classes "loose"
inside a rar then a compliant j2ca container will probably ignore them.
On Feb 15, 2010,
Hi,
So the lovely JCA resource adapters (a.k.a. rar files)...
In Maven 2.0.9, these were added to the classpath
In Maven 2.2.1, these are no longer added to the classpath...
The former made testing resource adapters easy, but causes issues when
packaging a resource adapter in an EAR...
The lat
