Re: [SUREFIRE] Issues with classpath and module path

Hello, Robert Scholte schrieb am Do., 24. Nov. 2016 um 20:44 Uhr: > Hi Benedikt, > > I noticed a new thread on the jigsaw mailinglist[1]. > It is close related to the issue I have: you don't want to "patch" java > with arguments just to allow split packages for certain modules. I really > hope t

Re: [SUREFIRE] Issues with classpath and module path

Hi Benedikt, I noticed a new thread on the jigsaw mailinglist[1]. It is close related to the issue I have: you don't want to "patch" java with arguments just to allow split packages for certain modules. I really hope that by chaining classloaders we can prevent this. Robert [1] http://ma

Re: [SUREFIRE] Issues with classpath and module path

On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:51:44 +0100, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hello again, Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Fr., 18. Nov. 2016 um 08:40 Uhr: Hi, I had the pleasure to meet Robert Scholte and Herve Boutemy here at ApacheCon in Seville. We talked al little bit about the progress of the JUnit 5 inte

Re: [SUREFIRE] Issues with classpath and module path

Hello again, Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Fr., 18. Nov. 2016 um 08:40 Uhr: > Hi, > > I had the pleasure to meet Robert Scholte and Herve Boutemy here at > ApacheCon in Seville. We talked al little bit about the progress of the > JUnit 5 integration. This let us to create two sample projects which

[SUREFIRE] Issues with classpath and module path

Hi, I had the pleasure to meet Robert Scholte and Herve Boutemy here at ApacheCon in Seville. We talked al little bit about the progress of the JUnit 5 integration. This let us to create two sample projects which may indicate problems both within surefire and within JUnit. We're still investigatin

Re: Surefire issues to close as Won't fix

I just want to have a look at the source of the GwtPlugin to see if there's a simple fix before 508 is closed. The Gwt interaction runs into nearly *all* the know and well documented problems with surefire (http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/class-loading.html). I g

Re: Surefire issues to close as Won't fix

+1 I was thinking too about SUREFIRE-508 2011/1/24 Kristian Rosenvold : > I am proposing to close the following issues as Won't fix. I have > attached a reason to each issue. I would appreciate it if > objections/comments just get added to the issue in question. > > I will close all of these issu

Re: Surefire issues to close as Won't fix

+1 to close all (I was quiet sure I rejected the idea of 367 already in another issue / email...) On 24/01/2011, at 9:50 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > I am proposing to close the following issues as Won't fix. I have > attached a reason to each issue. I would appreciate it if > objections/com

Surefire issues to close as Won't fix

I am proposing to close the following issues as Won't fix. I have attached a reason to each issue. I would appreciate it if objections/comments just get added to the issue in question. I will close all of these issues as wontfix in a week, depending on response. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SU

Re: Surefire Issues

On 3 Oct 07, at 1:26 PM 3 Oct 07, Paul Gier wrote: I can fix it locally without any problem using a copy from svn. But I was hoping to get it fixed in the upstream code. Would using GIT help with this? If it's a simple fix probably not. If you have to do any work then yes. You work on

Re: Surefire Issues

I can fix it locally without any problem using a copy from svn. But I was hoping to get it fixed in the upstream code. Would using GIT help with this? I mainly wanted to check with other people who have looked at this issue (maybe Brett or Carlos?) to maybe discuss what is the best way to fix

Re: Surefire Issues

It's GITed: http://git.sonatype.org/ You can work on surefire on your own machine. On 3 Oct 07, at 1:15 PM 3 Oct 07, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 3 Oct 07, at 11:59 AM 3 Oct 07, Paul Gier wrote: Hey Everyone, I have a quick question about this issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-31

Re: Surefire Issues

On 3 Oct 07, at 11:59 AM 3 Oct 07, Paul Gier wrote: Hey Everyone, I have a quick question about this issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-315 I was just wondering what is keeping this issue from getting resolved? I took a look at the attached patch locally to see if there is a

Surefire Issues

Hey Everyone, I have a quick question about this issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-315 I was just wondering what is keeping this issue from getting resolved? I took a look at the attached patch locally to see if there is a better way to solve the problem, but there isn't doesn't