Without breaking backwards compatibility, it could be a choice for the Pom.
Sure that’s an addition, but it it not like the format can never change.
It’s an excellent idea.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:28 PM Robert Scholte wrote:
> As mentioned by Elliotte this won't fit in the current pom model ve
As mentioned by Elliotte this won't fit in the current pom model version.
And it will effect dependency resolution. The current order of dependencies in
the pom reflects the order on the classpath.
As long as there are no duplicate classes you should be fine, but the real
world shows us differe
It's not a bad idea if we were starting from a green field. I'm not
sure how the broader community would feel about changing the structure
of the pom.xml file at this point. These things are very broadly used,
and my gut is that the small improvement would not justify the pain of
the transition.
O
Great suggestion
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:37 PM diku gabriell
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Gabriel Dicu.I am currently working with apache maven and I’d
> like to make a suggestion about improving maven dependency structure.In my
> opinion, dependencies should be organized better, because is
Hello,
My name is Gabriel Dicu.I am currently working with apache maven and I’d like
to make a suggestion about improving maven dependency structure.In my opinion,
dependencies should be organized better, because is difficult to spot
dependencies for different scopes.I think it is a good approa
Hello,
My name is Gabriel Dicu.I am currently working with apache maven and I’d like
to make a suggestion about improving maven dependency structure.In my opinion,
dependencies should be organized better, because is difficult to spot
dependencies for different scopes.I think it is a good approa
