Le 2025-04-15 à 14 h 13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
Assuming you use javac or a standard compiler as known today, this got
proven fragile multiple times even before jpms
When new parameters are added to javac, developers can use
as a tedious workaround until the compiler plugin is updated.
Le mar. 15 avr. 2025 à 13:03, Martin Desruisseaux <
martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit :
> Le 2025-04-15 à 11 h 53, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>
> >> If we add a new mechanism for allowing other plugins to access the
> >> configuration of the Java compiler plugin, it would make plugin
> >
Le 2025-04-15 à 11 h 53, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
If we add a new mechanism for allowing other plugins to access the
configuration of the Java compiler plugin, it would make plugin
evolution more risky since a change in the parameters could
potentially impact an unknown number of plugins.
Le mar. 15 avr. 2025 à 11:14, Martin Desruisseaux <
martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit :
> Le 2025-04-15 à 08 h 01, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>
> > Depends if exported or not, but if it is an interface or abstract class
> > just to enable the module itself pluggability and testability yo
Le 2025-04-15 à 08 h 01, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
Depends if exported or not, but if it is an interface or abstract class
just to enable the module itself pluggability and testability you still
need to do some homework.
If the homework are reflection, there is no --add-opens or other optio
Le mar. 15 avr. 2025 à 01:10, Martin Desruisseaux <
martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit :
> Le 2025-04-14 à 19 h 43, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>
> > This is not always true, the common case is to inject a mock of an
> external
> > service to test an algorithm or alike.
>
> If the service
Le 2025-04-14 à 19 h 43, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
This is not always true, the common case is to inject a mock of an external
service to test an algorithm or alike.
If the service is a public interface, there is no need to patch a module
for creating mocks.
I'd like all the JPMS to st
Le lun. 14 avr. 2025 à 18:57, Martin Desruisseaux <
martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit :
> Le 2025-04-14 à 17 h 36, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>
> > white/black box tests (or whatever name you use today) are a good example
> > which show you need at least two files exactly as today ("with
Le 2025-04-14 à 17 h 36, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
white/black box tests (or whatever name you use today) are a good example
which show you need at least two files exactly as today ("without jpms")
you play with surefire execution.
The proposed `module-info-patch` is for whitebox testing on
Le lun. 14 avr. 2025 à 15:03, Martin Desruisseaux <
martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit :
> Hello Romain
>
> Le 2025-04-14 à 14 h 28, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>
> > (…snip…)
> >
> > Doesn't it sound better than a file which looks like a java thing but is
> > not (content), has no editor
Hello Romain
Le 2025-04-14 à 14 h 28, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
(…snip…)
Doesn't it sound better than a file which looks like a java thing but is
not (content), has no editor support (extension), will need to be supported
by all plugins and still requires its location to be configurable sin
Hi,
maybe a bit out of context but some work was done to make it possible to
define options within the pom, why wouldn't it fit better than a hacky file
which is actually just an internal trick of some maven plugins but not all?
It would be like dependencies for a JVM.
Assuming to assign them a "s
Le 2025-04-14 à 12 h 49, Gary Gregory a écrit :
"The ".txt" extension is because this file is not standard Java
(proposals for better extension are welcome)."
How about ".mvn" or ".maven" to make it clear that this file exists
for Maven's purpose and is not documentation, which is what ".txt"
"The ".txt" extension is
because this file is not standard Java (proposals for better extension
are welcome)."
How about ".mvn" or ".maven" to make it clear that this file exists for
Maven's purpose and is not documentation, which is what ".txt" feels like
to me.
Gary
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025, 05:4
Hello all
The compiler plugin has a pull request which is ready for the support of
multi-release projects and modular projects defined by the
elements introduced in POM 4.1.0. However, the changes are a bit large
and I'm not sure how to proceed for review, as it would be a lot of work
for re
15 matches
Mail list logo
