; The link is more than three years old. One of the replies from SonarQube
> > contains a link that states that it is meanwhile (Aug 24) possible for
> > projects configured for Automatic Analysis
> > (https://portal.productboard.com/sonarsource/1-sonarqube-cloud/c/50-sonarcloud
n 5. Jan 2025, at 12:59, Gerd Aschemann wrote:
>
> The link is more than three years old. One of the replies from SonarQube
> contains a link that states that it is meanwhile (Aug 24) possible for
> projects configured for Automatic Analysis
> (https://portal.productboard.com/sonar
gs we don't need to fix and
> likely shouldn't fix. The ratio of true bugs to non-bugs is way too
> low to make SonarQube interesting. I certainly wouldn't want to run it
> on every PR until there's a way to eliminate 99.9%+ of the noise.
> Otherwise it will simply be
ones I
initially noticed, but I also notice that several bugs before and
after that are essentially noise: things we don't need to fix and
likely shouldn't fix. The ratio of true bugs to non-bugs is way too
low to make SonarQube interesting. I certainly wouldn't want to run it
on every PR u
e than three years old. One of the replies from SonarQube
> contains a link that states that it is meanwhile (Aug 24) possible for
> projects configured for Automatic Analysis
> (https://portal.productboard.com/sonarsource/1-sonarqube-cloud/c/50-sonarcloud-analyzes-external-pull-request
The link is more than three years old. One of the replies from SonarQube
contains a link that states that it is meanwhile (Aug 24) possible for projects
configured for Automatic Analysis
(https://portal.productboard.com/sonarsource/1-sonarqube-cloud/c/50-sonarcloud-analyzes-external-pull
at 14:10, Konrad Windszus wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Maven currently does not leverage SonarQube analysis (nor any other static
> >> code analysis). Although onboarding currently requires one INFRA ticket
> >> per repo
> >> (https://cwiki.apach
> On 4. Jan 2025, at 22:28, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 at 14:10, Konrad Windszus wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Maven currently does not leverage SonarQube analysis (nor any other static
>> code analysis). Although onboarding currently requi
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 at 14:10, Konrad Windszus wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Maven currently does not leverage SonarQube analysis (nor any other static
> code analysis). Although onboarding currently requires one INFRA ticket per
> repo
> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpa
Generally static analysis is useful on a one-off basis, but there are
> > rapidly diminishing returns for running it on the same codebase.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 1:10 PM Konrad Windszus wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Maven current
rns for running it on the same codebase.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 1:10 PM Konrad Windszus wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Maven currently does not leverage SonarQube analysis (nor any other static
>> code analysis). Although onboarding currently requires one INFRA
onrad Windszus wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Maven currently does not leverage SonarQube analysis (nor any other static
> code analysis). Although onboarding currently requires one INFRA ticket per
> repo
> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=INFRA&title=
Hi,
Maven currently does not leverage SonarQube analysis (nor any other static code
analysis). Although onboarding currently requires one INFRA ticket per repo
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=INFRA&title=SonarCloud+for+ASF+projects)
this is a one time ac
Already done :)
But contacting the SonarQube Administrator might be interesting too.
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 13:40:54 +0100, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
Robert,
I think this commit is breaking all of the builds, like this:
https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-box/job/maven-assembly-plugin/job
-plugin: You're not authorized
to execute any SonarQube analysis. Please contact your SonarQube
administrator. -> [Help 1]
Can we rollback this change ?
Enrico
Il giorno ven 28 dic 2018 alle ore 12:47 ha scritto:
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
more detailed view on that...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
[1]: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=55842
[2]:
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/SonarQube-Test-Maven-Enforcer/
-
To unsubscribe, e
integration example elsewhere.
>
> I will take a more detailed view on that...
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> [1]: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=55842
> [2]:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/vi
the first step...and simple approach with results[1]
> and the job[2].
>
> I will take a more detailed view on that...
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> [1]: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=55842
> [2]:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/vi
Hi,
so I have taken the first step...and simple approach with results[1]
and the job[2].
I will take a more detailed view on that...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
[1]: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=55842
[2]:
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/SonarQube
Java target.
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 20 octobre 2015 09:15:30 G. Ann Campbell a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I hope I'm directing this to the right list.
> >
> > SonarQube analysis on Nemo
> > <
the right list.
>
> SonarQube analysis on Nemo
> <http://nemo.sonarqube.org/dashboard/index/334402> has been failing for
> Doxia Aggregator since 26 Sept. with this:
>
> [INFO] *--- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce
> (enforce-bytecode-version) @ doxia-doc-rendere
> [1]
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/maven-parent/27/maven-parent-27.pom
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:15 PM, G. Ann Campbell <
> ann.campb...@sonarsource.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I hope I'm directing this to the right list.
&
Hi,
>
> I hope I'm directing this to the right list.
>
> SonarQube analysis on Nemo
> <http://nemo.sonarqube.org/dashboard/index/334402> has been failing for
> Doxia Aggregator since 26 Sept. with this:
>
> [INFO] *--- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce
>
Okay, thanks anyway.
---
*G. Ann CAMPBELL* | SonarSource
Product Owner
http://sonarsource.com
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:15 AM, G. Ann Campbell <
ann.campb...@sonarsource.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope I'm directing this to the right list.
>
> SonarQub
Hi,
I hope I'm directing this to the right list.
SonarQube analysis on Nemo
<http://nemo.sonarqube.org/dashboard/index/334402> has been failing for
Doxia Aggregator since 26 Sept. with this:
[INFO] *--- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce
(enforce-bytecode-version) @ doxia-d
25 matches
Mail list logo
