Re: Simplifying surefire classloader stucture.....

I'd love to see this happening. We would be a big step closer to allow more user-defined providers or extensions, which could easily be added as plugin-dependencies, without having to worry too much on when to load what. 2013/4/8 Brett Porter > I looked at something similar some time back and s

Re: Simplifying surefire classloader stucture.....

I looked at something similar some time back and struggled with it - but that was pre-shading of providers and still having to deal with the forking to the old booter. I suspect the combination of both will make this more feasible, but it's long enough ago that I can't remember anything more spe

Re: Simplifying surefire classloader stucture.....

2013/4/8 John Casey : > On 4/8/13 1:13 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: >> Surefire currently uses this classloader architecture : >> >> Boot

Re: Simplifying surefire classloader stucture.....

On 4/8/13 1:13 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: Surefire currently uses this classloader architecture : Boot

Simplifying surefire classloader stucture.....

Surefire currently uses this classloader architecture : Boot