Re: Shortening paths for core ITs

2008-09-22 Thread John Casey
+1 All of this sounds great to me. Thanks for taking this on. Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Brett Porter wrote: I would prefer core-it-suite to core-its, but it's a small thing. So we would have core-it-suite and core-it-support, looks nice IMHO and is still reasonably short (which is all I am i

Re: Shortening paths for core ITs

2008-09-22 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 22-Sep-08, at 2:14 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Brett Porter wrote: I would prefer core-it-suite to core-its, but it's a small thing. So we would have core-it-suite and core-it-support, looks nice IMHO and is still reasonably short (which is all I am interested in). So unless somebod

Re: Shortening paths for core ITs

2008-09-22 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brett Porter wrote: I would prefer core-it-suite to core-its, but it's a small thing. So we would have core-it-suite and core-it-support, looks nice IMHO and is still reasonably short (which is all I am interested in). So unless somebody objects, let's go for that ;-) I additionally think

Re: Shortening paths for core ITs

2008-09-22 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Just a remark : sometime you replace integration-tests by "its" otherwise by "it". Perhaps we could unify them . Yes, you're right. The distinction between singular/plural is rather irrelevant here so I agree, let's have it all "it" for consistency. Benjamin ---

Re: Shortening paths for core ITs

2008-09-21 Thread Mauro Talevi
Arnaud HERITIER wrote: +1 Just a remark : sometime you replace integration-tests by "its" otherwise by "it". Perhaps we could unify them . For example you propose to rename core-integration-tests-support to core-it-support and not to core-its-support. +1 -

Re: Shortening paths for core ITs

2008-09-21 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 Just a remark : sometime you replace integration-tests by "its" otherwise by "it". Perhaps we could unify them . For example you propose to rename core-integration-tests-support to core-it-support and not to core-its-support. Arnaud On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Shortening paths for core ITs

2008-09-21 Thread Brett Porter
+1 to all I would prefer core-it-suite to core-its, but it's a small thing. I additionally think the src/main/resources/* paths could be reduced to just the issue number (mng-1234), without the description of the problem (the description can be retained in Java test class). It is the resou

Shortening paths for core ITs

2008-09-21 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, motivated by a recent user's mail that a checkout of the core ITs failed, I would like to suggest the following renames to make contributing a little easier. More precisely, in core-integration-testing/trunk change core-integration-tests -> core-its core-integration-tests/src/main