Re: SCM Providers

2015-03-03 Thread Chris Graham
t;> Op Thu, 26 Feb 2015 01:10:43 +0100 schreef Chris Graham < >>> chrisgw...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> >>> Hi Robert. >>> >>>> >>>> Yes, it's time that I think we should. :) >>>> >>>> I may have

Re: SCM Providers

2015-03-03 Thread Robert Scholte
to fixing the outstanding Jazz issues. Firstly, what do we call the workitemId/ticketNo/whateverelsethingsarecalled ? Where do we put it? I'd be tempted to put it in the same structure as pushChanges, as it's easily accessable and can be used across all scm providers. So you've sai

Re: SCM Providers

2015-03-03 Thread Chris Graham
lsethingsarecalled ? >> Where do we put it? I'd be tempted to put it in the same structure as >> pushChanges, as it's easily accessable and can be used across all scm >> providers. >> >> So you've said that MS TFS uses (is it optional or mandatory?) a wor

Re: SCM Providers

2015-03-03 Thread Robert Scholte
tly, what do we call the workitemId/ticketNo/whateverelsethingsarecalled ? Where do we put it? I'd be tempted to put it in the same structure as pushChanges, as it's easily accessable and can be used across all scm providers. So you've said that MS TFS uses (is it optional or mandatory?)

Re: SCM Providers

2015-02-25 Thread Chris Graham
hanges, as it's easily accessable and can be used across all scm providers. So you've said that MS TFS uses (is it optional or mandatory?) a workitem concept. Jazz does, and it's optional per workspace. What other SCM use/require a workitem concept? ClearQuest enabled UCM Clearca

Re: SCM Providers

2014-09-10 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Chris, I had to dive deep in my mail archive, but it seems that the day after my attempt a colleague managed to release with my initial setup. So it probably had to do with my rights, configuration or whatever. I'll ask the status of that project and if the still can release successfully

Re: SCM Providers

2014-09-09 Thread Chris Graham
Hi Robert! >From a thread a long time ago! This issue has popped up again. https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-775 Did you/How did you ever end up solving the issue for TFS? You're right, a general solution would be preferable. I think the workflow around the (re)use of a Work Item would be d

Re: SCM Providers

2013-07-24 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, Recently I had a look at Microsoft Team Foundation Server and faced the same kind of issue. I'm not sure if you could/should reuse a WorkItem. For the maven-release-plugin this could very well be acceptable, but for commits in general? I don't think so. If it is static, then you can ma

SCM Providers

2013-07-23 Thread Chris Graham
Hey All. In the RTC/Jazz forum, a request came up for the ability to associate a Work Item with the commits that the SCM plugin does. On the Jazz side, I think that I've worked things out. However, I am unsure as to how to best do this on the maven and scm provider side. The generic question bo

Re: svn commit: r894145 [1/2] - in /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-git: ./ maven-scm-provider-jgit/ maven-scm-provider-jgit/src/ maven-scm-provider-jgit/src/main/ maven-scm-

2009-12-29 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I have moved this to sandbox until we have released (or snapshots) dependencies available. Thanks, -- Olivier 2009/12/29 Brett Porter : > On 29/12/2009, at 9:34 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> maybe I should have mentioned: the jgit-simple was written by me. But I only >> combined fragments of

Re: svn commit: r894145 [1/2] - in /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-git: ./ maven-scm-provider-jgit/ maven-scm-provider-jgit/src/ maven-scm-provider-jgit/src/main/ maven-scm-

2009-12-28 Thread Brett Porter
On 29/12/2009, at 9:34 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > maybe I should have mentioned: the jgit-simple was written by me. But I only > combined fragments of existing code I found in jgit-core (plus Jason and > Shawn Pearce helped me), so this has also BSD license. Since we host this on > sonatype, we

Re: maven-scm-providers-git initial version

2008-04-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
t; git-clone http://ns1.backwork.net/git/maven-scm-providers-git.git as usual... Please provide feedback, so we can move this to codehaus if it's mature enough. Great stuff. I've played with some functionality and it worked with cygwin git after I fixed some minor things on W

RE: maven-scm-providers-git initial version

2008-04-05 Thread Eugene Kuleshov
struberg wrote: > > For the really 'edgy' guys out there: I've fixed the > maven-scm-provider-git to also work with > git-1.5.4. > > $> git-clone http://ns1.backwork.net/git/maven-scm-providers-git.git > as usual... > > Please provide feedback, s

RE: maven-scm-providers-git initial version

2008-02-06 Thread Mark Struberg
For the really 'edgy' guys out there: I've fixed the maven-scm-provider-git to also work with git-1.5.4. $> git-clone http://ns1.backwork.net/git/maven-scm-providers-git.git as usual... Please provide feedback, so we can move this to codehaus if it's mature enough. L

RE: maven-scm-providers-git initial version

2007-12-14 Thread Mark Struberg
--- Mark Struberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi! > > I used a few days in bed to write a scm provider for git. > I basically looked at a few of the standard maven scm-providers (cvs, svn, > vss) and decided to > take the maven-scm-providers-svn to act as the basis of the git

maven-scm-providers-git initial version

2007-11-28 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi! I used a few days in bed to write a scm provider for git. I basically looked at a few of the standard maven scm-providers (cvs, svn, vss) and decided to take the maven-scm-providers-svn to act as the basis of the git implementation. So there are most probably still a few svn-ish commands in

Re: svn commit: r496356 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml

2007-03-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
rs can be tested without SCM installations. Why do you put them in a profile? Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Author: jvanzyl Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007 New Revision: 496356 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=496356 Log: o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM

Re: svn commit: r496356 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml

2007-03-17 Thread Brett Porter
Why do you put them in a profile? Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Author: jvanzyl Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007 New Revision: 496356 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=496356 Log: o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM providers, we'll need some de

Re: svn commit: r496356 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml

2007-01-16 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
iders can be tested without SCM installations. Why do you put them in a profile? Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Author: jvanzyl Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007 New Revision: 496356 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=496356 Log: o create a profile which contains all the weird

Re: svn commit: r496356 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml

2007-01-15 Thread Brett Porter
nstallations. Why do you put them in a profile? Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Author: jvanzyl Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007 New Revision: 496356 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=496356 Log: o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM providers, we

Re: svn commit: r496356 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml

2007-01-15 Thread Jason van Zyl
u put them in a profile? Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Author: jvanzyl Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007 New Revision: 496356 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=496356 Log: o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM providers, we'll need some decent profi

Re: svn commit: r496356 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml

2007-01-15 Thread Brett Porter
M installations. Why do you put them in a profile? Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Author: jvanzyl Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007 New Revision: 496356 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=496356 Log: o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM providers, we'll

Re: svn commit: r496356 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml

2007-01-15 Thread Jason van Zyl
ntains all the weirder SCM providers, we'll need some decent profile activators which tell us if the provider is support on the system. Modified: maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml Modified: maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/

Re: svn commit: r496356 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml

2007-01-15 Thread Brett Porter
o you put them in a profile? Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Author: jvanzyl Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007 New Revision: 496356 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=496356 Log: o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM providers, we'll need some decent profi

Re: svn commit: r496356 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml

2007-01-15 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
;rev=496356 Log: o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM providers, we'll need some decent profile activators which tell us if the provider is support on the system. Modified: maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml Modified: maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/po

Re: svn commit: r481350 - in /maven/scm/trunk: ./ maven-scm-api/ maven-scm-client/ maven-scm-managers/ maven-scm-managers/maven-scm-manager-plexus/ maven-scm-plugin/ maven-scm-providers/ maven-scm-pro

2006-12-01 Thread Brett Porter
; maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-api/pom.xml >> maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-client/pom.xml >> maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-managers/maven-scm-manager-plexus/ >> pom.xml >> maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-managers/pom.xml >> maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-plugin/pom

Re: svn commit: r481350 - in /maven/scm/trunk: ./ maven-scm-api/ maven-scm-client/ maven-scm-managers/ maven-scm-managers/maven-scm-manager-plexus/ maven-scm-plugin/ maven-scm-providers/ maven-scm-pro

2006-12-01 Thread Carlos Sanchez
/maven-scm-manager-plexus/ >> pom.xml >> maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-managers/pom.xml >> maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-plugin/pom.xml >> maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-bazaar/ >> pom.xml >> maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-provide

Re: svn commit: r481350 - in /maven/scm/trunk: ./ maven-scm-api/ maven-scm-client/ maven-scm-managers/ maven-scm-managers/maven-scm-manager-plexus/ maven-scm-plugin/ maven-scm-providers/ maven-scm-pro

2006-12-01 Thread Brett Porter
-client/pom.xml maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-managers/maven-scm-manager-plexus/ pom.xml maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-managers/pom.xml maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-plugin/pom.xml maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-bazaar/ pom.xml maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/mav

Re: svn commit: r481350 - in /maven/scm/trunk: ./ maven-scm-api/ maven-scm-client/ maven-scm-managers/ maven-scm-managers/maven-scm-manager-plexus/ maven-scm-plugin/ maven-scm-providers/ maven-scm-pro

2006-12-01 Thread Carlos Sanchez
l maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-plugin/pom.xml maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-bazaar/pom.xml maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-clearcase/pom.xml maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-local/pom.xml maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-

testers needed for ClearCase, perforce, starteam SCM providers

2005-04-30 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I was wondering if anyone using Maven is also using ClearCase, Perform or StarTeam in their environment on a regular basis, and would be interested in helping to test out releases of the SCM plugin and Changlog plugin. I would like to revisit this in about 2 weeks. Please don't CC both lists