On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after some discussions at FOSDEM with Hervé, Kristian and Robert in Brussels
> i will summarize some ideas we would like to share here:
>
> Make a final release of all plugins with minium Maven 2.2.1 (prerequisites)
> and Java 1
I'll poke around.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> ARCHETYPE-431 fixed.
> However, when building I see a bunch of Maven "Build Failure" in the output
> from tests. Don't know if that's expected, but it looks weird. The tests
> pass though, but that could be wrong. Didn't hav
ARCHETYPE-431 fixed.
However, when building I see a bunch of Maven "Build Failure" in the output
from tests. Don't know if that's expected, but it looks weird. The tests
pass though, but that could be wrong. Didn't have time to look into that.
Also, there are some warnings in the build that could b
I'll have a look.
/Anders (mobile)
Den 4 feb 2015 14:03 skrev "Benson Margulies" :
> Gents, are you willing to do it and I'll just be RM?
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Arnaud Héritier
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Anders Hammar
> wrote:
> >
> >> > Ouch that's
Gents, are you willing to do it and I'll just be RM?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
>
>> > Ouch that's an old one :-)
>> >
>> > Yes I was interested to have a 2.3 release but we failed to find the
>> > motiva
+1
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> > Ouch that's an old one :-)
> >
> > Yes I was interested to have a 2.3 release but we failed to find the
> > motivation/time to close 431
>
>
> Yes, I hardly even remember this one. The code seems to be fixed except the
> unit test. I'd
> Ouch that's an old one :-)
>
> Yes I was interested to have a 2.3 release but we failed to find the
> motivation/time to close 431
Yes, I hardly even remember this one. The code seems to be fixed except the
unit test. I'd say we should go for the easiest way so that we could close
this ticket.
Ouch that's an old one :-)
Yes I was interested to have a 2.3 release but we failed to find the
motivation/time to close 431
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:12 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> I didn't work on this one for a long time
>
> Anders and Arnaud seem to have problems to decide how to fix and clos
I didn't work on this one for a long time
Anders and Arnaud seem to have problems to decide how to fix and close
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-431
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 3 février 2015 21:50:00 Benson Margulies a écrit :
> So, I've committed changes to the archetype system that I
So, I've committed changes to the archetype system that I believe
correspond to the 2.2.1 level. What else wants to happen before a
release?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Le lundi 2 février 2015 12:42:02 Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> after some discussions at
Le lundi 2 février 2015 12:42:02 Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> after some discussions at FOSDEM with Hervé, Kristian and Robert in
> Brussels i will summarize some ideas we would like to share here:
>
> Make a final release of all plugins with minium Maven 2.2.1
> (prerequisites) and Ja
Sounds good to me. I especially like the Maven 3.0 (not 3.0.5) requirement.
/Anders
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after some discussions at FOSDEM with Hervé, Kristian and Robert in
> Brussels i will summarize some ideas we would like to share here:
>
> M
Hi,
after some discussions at FOSDEM with Hervé, Kristian and Robert in
Brussels i will summarize some ideas we would like to share here:
Make a final release of all plugins with minium Maven 2.2.1
(prerequisites) and Java 1.5
The current state of this approach can be watched on the dist-to
13 matches
Mail list logo
