> I myself have not used the bootstrap in 18 months. I use a previously built
> version of Maven. Anyone using it? Anyone care if I remove it?
You just read my mind. I had this idea for weeks but didn't had the option to
work on that.
I strongly support to remove all build files for Ant. Maven f
If you use it that's fine. No harm in it being there.
I find it more consistent to build Maven with Maven. Personally I don't want to
ever have to update the Ant build file again.
On Dec 20, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Perso I use it as I find it very convenient. Not extra unzip,
Perso I use it as I find it very convenient. Not extra unzip, env var to
change just running ant cli, etc..
What is the problem with? It just works fine.
--
Olivier
On 20 Dec 2014 11:54, "Barrie Treloar" wrote:
> On 20 December 2014 at 10:37, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >
> > I myself have not used
On 20 December 2014 at 10:37, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> I myself have not used the bootstrap in 18 months. I use a previously
> built version of Maven. Anyone using it? Anyone care if I remove it?
+1.
It's a complicated setup that can be avoided.
I myself have not used the bootstrap in 18 months. I use a previously built
version of Maven. Anyone using it? Anyone care if I remove it?
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
http://twitter.com/
